you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Plastickillsyou 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Start quote: “We propose a gender-expansive approach to human identification by combing missing and unidentified databases looking for contextual clues such as decedents wearing clothing culturally coded to a gender other than their assigned sex,” the group’s mission statement reads. End quote.

Seriously? This doesn't seem to be a scientific approach or is it me not understanding things?

[–]Neo_Shadow_Lurker 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So they want to classify human bone structure by using criteria completely unrelated to the subject.

Yeah...