Rowling is evil and her work should be eradicated, amirite fellas?

submitted by r2d2_21 from twitter.com

all 5 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]LordoftheFliesAmeri-kin 2.0. Pronouns: MegaWhite/SuperStraight/UltraPatriarchy 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Of course Rowling is evil, she won't use her vast cultural reach to validate the troons and their apologists. And to the narcissist, any denial of the primacy of their reality is a crime that surpasses the Holocaust, the Killing Fields of Cambodia, and the cancelation of Firefly after only one season.

[–]Datachost 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

I genuinely can't tell if this is meant to be pro trans. Comparing yourself to a drooling hick really isn't a good look

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Is it not merely satire? Think it's pointing out the horseshoe of trans-slacktivists being in the same camp and dumb book burners.

Granted if reading was their forte they might actually read the Rowling manifesto and see it's fairly reasonable. Read it here for yourself.

https://www.jkrowling.com/opinions/j-k-rowling-writes-about-her-reasons-for-speaking-out-on-sex-and-gender-issues/

[–]r2d2_21[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Is it not merely satire?

No. The drooling hick is a good character in this webcomic. The whole point is that she's “doing good” without understanding it.

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ah the classic unintentional self-burn.

It's quite ironic really, back when these came out the Baptist nutters would hold Harry Potter book burning bonfires, few decades later I wonder if you can't find the satanists doing the same.