you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]iamonlyoneman 11 insightful - 3 fun11 insightful - 2 fun12 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

Stripping our womb-carriers of any other facet of their self being worthy of inclusion when mentioning of them? Perfectly fine!

[–]bopomofodojo 10 insightful - 4 fun10 insightful - 3 fun11 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

Because women who hate being women so much they cosplay as men, might get offended that someone is referencing their female anatomy with the word that describes people with that anatomy. But this is not misogyny, not reducing women (whoops, womb-holders!) to their anatomy. Nope, not at all. Apparently this is "progressive".

[–]jet199 9 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

This stuff is more for trans women so they don't go into narcissists collapse at the thought they are excluded from anything to do with the word "woman".

Which is funny because the way they've written this is one of the surest ways to tell trans women they can never be women. They are just too stupid to see it.