you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Dr_Douchebag 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

There is no harm if that is what people voluntarily choose to use for energy. The harm comes from the government forcing people to use a certain form of energy. Eventually fossil fuels will become rare and subsequently more expensive and solar will become cheaper. Until that happens though, forcing people to use more expensive forms of energy will harm poor people the most because they will not be able to afford it and will have side effects of making all things more expensive.

People will naturally move away from fossil fuels when it is economically viable. The government needs to get out of the way

[–]wizzwizz4 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

There is no harm if that is what people voluntarily choose to use for energy.

That has not been proven.

[–]Dr_Douchebag 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

My point was there is no economic harm if people are choosing something like solar for whatever reason. There is harm if people are being forced to use it

[–]wizzwizz4 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Economic harm is a subset of all harm. Please specify in future.

[–]Dr_Douchebag 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Cool, I actually explained it if you kept reading and didn't nitpick wording.

[–]wizzwizz4 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Did you? Where? If you did, I really need to work on my reading comprehension skills! :-)