/u/MartinTimothy, this comment contradicts itself.

For a start, your first link is from an entirely climate-change-hoax focused site, which isn't a good sign. Here's a quote from it:

Note: Many of the scientists and studies cited below

Note that it proceeds to then cite no studies, papers or scholarly articles of any kind – just other pages on its site and similar ones. I suspect that it's articles all the way down.

And if the Earth is undergoing Global Cooling (by which I assume you mean the opposite of Climate Change), why have you posted so many articles about the causes of things melting, heating up and abnormal weather? Because that is Climate Change.

All you're saying here is that Global Warming (a description of average behaviours of the Earth, and largely superseded by Climate Change) is caused by chemicals released into the atmosphere (and HAARP, which I won't address).

Climate Change is the theory that the global climate is changing, largely due to the chemicals released into the atmosphere.

It looks like you're just disagreeing about which chemicals, and whether it's deliberate.

(Also, I don't call JPEG artefacts and interestingly-shaped rocks evidence of life on Mars, especially considering that you can verify Mars' atmospheric content yourself using a powerful telescope and a prism and find that there's barely any – certainly not enough to support a fox. That doesn't mean that there isn't life on Mars; just that we haven't found it yet. Do you seriously think NASA would cover up basically their only chance of getting funding right now?)