use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~3 users here now
A No Nonsense Explanation of Pizzagate
submitted 5 years ago by TheWebOfSlime from self.TheWebOfSlime
view the rest of the comments →
[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 5 years ago (5 children)
It's all circumstantial. However, many have been executed for less evidence than that.
IMO it's legit. If the FBI is covering it up, then it's not easy to prosecute this.
[–]TheWebOfSlime[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 5 years ago (4 children)
Which part is circumstantial?
They were being blackmailed. Fact.
The social circles contains many known, convicted pedophiles. Fact.
Some of these people have repeatedly appeared in pictures with naked children. Fact.
They are tied together financially. Fact.
I'd be curious to know what aspect is circumstantial, so I can improve my presentation.
I kept to 10,000 characters to perform as summary that could fit on most platforms, but I have a lot more detailed information on each issue. If I sound conclusionary on any specific issue, I have more to back it up and I'd be happy to learn where it needs to fit.
[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 5 years ago (3 children)
The circumstantial part where expensive lawyers and their powerful connections will get them out of it so they won't go to prison. So the public won't examine the facts as legit.
I see the obvious facts, and can easily connect the overwhelming number of dots. The CSI brainwashed public will expect 6 sigma certainty, which rarely exists without forensic investigation.
The real issue is that people are generally honest and decent. It's beyond comprehensive that their public officials could be involved in this, so they deny the facts.
[–]TheWebOfSlime[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 5 years ago (2 children)
Yeah. "Normalcy bias." You really gotta lead the horses to water slowly and carefully.
[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 5 years ago (0 children)
Yep.
Fortunately, thoroughbreds like yourself keep finding the waters of truth for the rest of us.
Keep it up! :-)
[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 5 years ago (0 children)
view the rest of the comments →
[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (5 children)
[–]TheWebOfSlime[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (4 children)
[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (3 children)
[–]TheWebOfSlime[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)