you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Sw0rdofDam0cles 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

> Given that our respondents perceived the photo of the man holding a cat as more feminine, it is also possible they subconsciously (or consciously) perceived him as *being gay.** Kranz, Pröbstle, and Evidis [16] found that homosexual men were rated as more feminine and less or equally masculine than heterosexual men as rated by college aged men and women. If this indeed remains a cultural perception, then women who perceive a man holding a cat as less masculine could, potentially, believe he is also gay. This may be compounded by the perceptions of him as more neurotic, as well. However, additional research would be needed to confirm this possibility.*

Translation: "How do we make faggots more appealing to female Goyim?"

A lot of Jewish names are on this social analysis study. Never a good thing for people who still engage mainstream media.

[–]liberty_primer[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What could they have possibly done to make you happy with them? Here are to options:

1.) Interpret the data honestly 2.) Lie

They have apparently done the former. What’s your issue with that?