Security State Using Coronavirus To Implement Orwellian Nightmare [with Whitney Webb] (30:03) ~ The Jimmy Dore Show

submitted by JasonCarswell from youtube.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]jmichaelhudsondotnet 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Whitney Webb is controlled opposition, she is not a real person.

Debbie LuSignon was the same thing in regards to the Las Vegas shooting, Whitney Webb is the epstein version.

The Last American Vagabond, Caitlin Johnstone, The Conscious Resistance, Mint Press News, The Free Thought Project, Disobedient Media, Elizabeth Lea Vos, Adam Carter

These are all disinformation agents and if you look into the backgrounds of all of these people, you will not find them, they simply appeared one day on the internet and gave each other credibility. Steemit is one of the keys to it, you can see them all upvoting each other and associating with the account V4vapid.

I spent some time under an alias trying to figure out what all of these people were up to, and they did not answer any direct questions, were evasive, yet are very chatty with each other. And get $ from upvotes on steemit without effort. (you try that sometimes)

Sadly, this means anyone who promotes them heavily is also probably in on it.....or very gullible. Whitney Webb is essentially Epstein investigating himself, which is also why nothing she says ever results in anything changing, and why she never herself, or any of these outlets, finds any new facts. They only re-report what is known.

"The Pentagon is going to war on journalists" - Michael Hastings, shortly before he was murdered

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Evidence?

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, not just flinging opinion to the wall to see what sticks.

Whitney Webb seems real enough to me. Knows her shit inside and out and deserves all the accolades she gets. Among the sea of truth-seekers, she has managed to stand out. I say bravo to her being the female James Corbett, on who's shoulders she in part stands. It took him a dozen years to achieve what she has in the couple that I've been aware of her, though I suspect more I didn't know about.

Debbie, the Sane Progressive, also knows her shit. Before Vegas I was following her keenly and I was concerned for her with her epic rants, and finally she blew a gasket and stepped back. Not so sane. Not crazy, but emotionally fragile.

I have yet to see ANY problem with TLAV or Broze or Johnstone. I'm not familiar with Free Thought or Mint Press enough, and wonder what motivated Whitney to change. I don't know those others but they're in good company, so thanks for the references to dig into.

What about James Corbett, Know More News, Ryan Dawson, Truthstream Media, reallygraceful, etc? And how are the messages different between those you claim are controlled or limited hangouts and those who aren't yet seek and speak truth?

We all appeared on the Internet one day. Interesting theory about Steemit, though I'm not sure those folks are whales. If you can write up an article with citations and an abundance of evidence then I'd be very keen to see it, and even promote it if it looks correct.

These people have limited time, so no answer is not uncommon, and evasive answers might be your interpretation of an answer that simply didn't meet your needs for details. They can only indulge with answers so much.

On Steemit you either need to crawl up through their rigged system and earn your position - or you have to come ready to Steemit with a fanbase - which many of them have built via other social network platforms. Also, people of note tend have a natural viscosity to the public, simply because that's how people view "celebrity". One famous person talking to another famous person is memorable. One famous person talking to a person who is never seen again is forgettable. They talk to more non-famous people all the time, yet we remember it like it's a small club. This is obvious.

Are you kidding? Whitney just released Part 1 of a recording that introduces a LOT of new information. And so much more beyond. Yes, she's digging up old information, but so much of it did not have dot-connecting context to it, or was lost in the memory hole. For those of us who are new to truth-seeking and haven't been following along intensely since the 90s and before, this is VERY important work.

You have my attention now. But when I finish my epic story, eventually, I might be fortunate enough to achieve some success with it. At that point I'm pretty sure I won't have time for these discussions. That won't make me a shill. It makes me occupied with other priorities in my life.

I agree there's a war on journalists and there's a lot of misinformation out there. But it's also important NOT to call our friends enemies.

You need to bring the proof in a big way. I'm open to it.

[–]jmichaelhudsondotnet 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Establishing yourself as a journalist, you do have to provide credentials and not just appear out of nowhere, which is what all of these people are.

And once I know one of them isnt real, and the conscious resistance is not real, anyone else who promotes them are suspect. That includes in this case the corbett report, who plugs the conscious resistance. They operate in networks to give the illusion of popular support. It is a major cop tactic that cops help the reps of other cops and team up against those that are not in on their game.

It became legal around 2012 for the us military to create propaganda for the us population, and if you are unable to detect any of this, well, then they have you hook line and sinker. Once no one trusts them, they disappear like debbie lusignon. Whitney webb gets upvoted at r/conspiracy, which is impossible for any truly independent journalist at this point, which should be enough evidence for any discerning person.

You also "jason carswell" fit the entire checklist of paid shill as well, and I have not encountered any real accounts here at saidit yet, fwiw.

The primary trait being the complete and utter ability to rationally discuss police state infiltration of civilian society, throwing 10 whataboutsisms and playing completely dumb to the existence of cointelpro, and other things discussed above.

I had hoped there would be less of this at saidit but here we are.

By comparison I have written and self published nearly 500 pages, plus posts at numerous sites, attempting to out the tactics they are using, and report constant harassment, censorship, sabotage, threats, infiltration. And by comparison any of the people you list, and yourself, if you were actually writing the things powerful people did not want you to write, would not have such an easy ride while you throw around cliches about rising up.

So no, I do not need proof, I just need a bullshit detector and it is going off full red alert on you and everyone you reference. And any proof I would provide you would just move the goalposts until I was breaking into someone's apartment looking for their secret code sheets, at which point in time I would be accused of insanity, trying to prove something to the esteemed "jason carswell."

That I even have to explain this....