you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]theFriendlyDoomer 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

What does that even mean? Did some non-government Jewish groups hold a publicity stunt press conference or something?

I'm not trying to be disrespectful. I just don't know what you're talking about. Do you have a link to something -- ideally, something from a historian or even Wikipedia?

But, war is declared by governments. At that time, we did it through Congress. After that, we started doing it more and more through executive order. Hitler as executive of his country declared war on us.

And, yes, we were supplying the U.K. heavily. But still, declaring the war is a blunder -- maybe even a bigger one than opening up the Soviet front before the U.K. was defeated. I mean, seriously, educate me if you have the time and evidence, but it looks like Hitler had multiple opportunities to shift into a defensive stance, having already acquired "living space" for his people. (I understand oil might be another matter. Still don't declare war on the U.S. The U.S. public would have been it's finicky self).

[–]asterias 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Some events are mentioned here

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1933_anti-Nazi_boycott#Events_in_the_United_States

I have seen other articles and videos (which I don't have handy at the moment) about American Jews and Jewish Mafia attacking political parties and gatherings in the USA with complete impunity. Judging from what happened with those organisations (American Jewish Committee, American Jewish Congress and B'nai B'rith) when they pressured various governments to ban political parties in Europe during the last decade, I can only imagine how provoking their moves would be back then.

War is officially declared by governments, but certain groups appear to exercise significant control over governments and even preoccupy government decisions.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

they did a BDS movement on germany. But did germany really feel the need to declare war on USA just because of that? I think Hitler was trying to make proactive moves, war would be inevitable so why not strike first. They were working on a wonderwaffen so he might have figured he'd have nukes eventually so it'd work out.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Hitler sought peace with the US and UK at every turn (and the war was never popular among the citizens of these countries). Germany was dragged into the war due to its treaty with Japan, and the ABCD Line amounts to an act of war on the part of the US.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

hitler had a peace agreement with Russia, later invaded them. He probably correctly thought they'd break the agreement soon so why not attack first and have he advantage. He also needed oil, a major reason for the entire world war in the first place, Russia had it.

I like playing the board game Risk and I think it is true to life, you need to take a risk. Sometimes send your troops and attack a powerful opponent even if it spreads your troops thin. Hoping by your next turn you can regroup. Having a lot of land is valuable as it gets you more troops. Sometimes don't attack an opponent because you want them to be a buffer between you and another opponent that is more powerful.