you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]antares 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The terminology or sentence structure around "non-trans" should be revised. It might sound better if it's about the preference for natural sex than it is about the exclusion of transgenders.

[–]Ambik 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I agree. I think it would sound better as attraction to biological sex.

I.e. biological sex is important to sexual attraction not merely "gender" or gender identity.