I love democracy

submitted by 79malibu350 from (mobile.twitter.com)

all 9 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]Happy_Blueberry3910 12 insightful - 4 fun12 insightful - 3 fun13 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

They hate free speech because they don't have any serious arguments, only insults ("Nazi!", "Fascist!", "Transphobe!"), lies and coercion.

[–]i_hate_cheese_eaters 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

People without twitter cannot see the poll results. Mind helping out a fellow super?

[–]79malibu350[S] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

As of this morning 92% of over 2500 people I think have selected “no, im a transphobe.”

[–]Terfenclaw 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Lmao! The numbers don't surprise me

https://saidit.net/s/SuperStraight/comments/7jzn/superstraight_is_a_made_up_sexuality/

[–]RippoffOfLove 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

They got big companies like Reddit and Google wrapped around their finger and they still think they're oppressed. Give me a break. When they chant "trans rights are human rights," is it a human right to be able to say "suck my girldick" to someone without getting spat on? What are they fighting for if not being in someone's dating pool upsets them?

[–]i_hate_cheese_eaters 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Please, don't respond to hate with hate. The only thing wrong with the thing they do to us is thinking that they can gatekeep feeling like a victim. Trans certainly are victims too, but the hypocritical part is that they deny us being a victim while themselves being victims.

[–]RippoffOfLove 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

To be clear, I would never do that. Just seems like they're demanding that their actions shouldn't have any consequences.

[–]79malibu350[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

So I took the time to look into this “unbiased” journalist Jamie Barton a little more. She’s written articles about how cars are sexist, urinals are transphobic and my personal favorite: video games rated M should require background checks and mandatory representation approved by lgbtq+ representatives. Super allies, I ask you, at this point can we just say q+ when referencing these wackos? I’d prefer to not sully your good names anymore.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

We at GC use either TRA (trans rights activist) or QT (queer theory.) Queer theory covers people who believe you don't need dysphoria to be trans, you don't need to do anything to your body to be trans, support xenogenders such as moongender, try to say that biology is a social construct, deny AGP as a condition, push medical transition for very young children, support self-ID et cetera.

The opposite would be the transmedicalist, who generally believe that gender dysphoria is a diagnosable disorder, people should only transition to alleviate gender dysphoria and acknowledge they cannot change their biological sex. There are problems with this belief too but generally not the same level of crazy as the QT.

Someone could be a Trans Rights Activist and only cover issues that transmedicalists and the general population would support, such as gatekeeping or equal opportunity housing and employment, but they are rare.