I noticed this over on the Mumsnet feminism forum.
Posted by "yeahbutnaw":
"Personally, I'm really happy that trans exclusionists have created their own sexuality.
It means the rest of us can keep our existing labels as regular gay people, lesbians and bisexuals."
Reply given by "NecessaryScene1":
We prefer the terms "subgays", "sublesbians" and "subbisexuals".
(Sub is a Latin prefix, meaning the opposite of "super").
https://www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/4184352-Superstraight?pg=35
Of course this isn't intended to be insulting to anyone. It's just using a Latin prefix to make clear the meaning.
So non-supers could be called "subs" or "sub-hets" etc.
Good idea?
[–]TurtleFuzz 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun - (5 children)
[–]Britishbulldog 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (3 children)
[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–]Britishbulldog 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun - (2 children)
[–]ElectricSheep 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - (1 child)
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]jet199 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun - (1 child)
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - (0 children)
[–]fschmidt 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]grixit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)