you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Marou 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Exactly, they want people focused on nice harmless bullshit conspiracies like bigfoot and AYY LMAOS. Not pedo sex cults like NXIVM and Epstein, not Zionist groups that demand closed borders for Israel while simultaneously funding NGO's busy flooding the west with third world immigrants. Conspiracies in the first bucket are "cute", conspiracies in the second second can and do justifiably piss people off.

[–]Ian 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Exactly, they want people focused on nice harmless bullshit conspiracies like bigfoot and AYY LMAOS. Not (...)

Harmless conspiracies for now, but I don't agree they're bullshit. As far as I've seen, it's about as much hard evidence for "visitors" as it is for an intent and connection behind the examples you provide.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

It's interesting that you left out the details that are factually supported...

...pedo sex cults like NXIVM and Epstein, not Zionist groups that demand closed borders for Israel while simultaneously funding NGO's busy flooding the west with third world immigrants.

  • The pedo sex cults are real, and many involved have already been prosecuted and found guilty/confessed.
  • Israel has closed it's borders.
  • Zionist NGOs are flooding Europe with 3rd world immigrants that are fleeing the conflicts that have been fought for the Greater Israel Yinone Plan (Iraq, and Syria).

So there's plenty of evidence. The corporate media intentionally ignore the facts, and/or misrepresent them.

[–]Ian 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

It's interesting that you left out the details that are factually supported...

Yes, I didn't bother providing supporting evidence for a viewpoint we mostly share and agree on.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

As far as I've seen, it's about as much hard evidence for "visitors" as it is for an intent and connection behind the examples you provide.

You claim that there is no evidence of any conspiracy.

I didn't bother providing supporting evidence for a viewpoint we mostly share and agree on.

You suggest that you agree that there is a conspiracy, but don't need to provide supporting evidence.

I suspect that this 3 day old account was created, so you could shill.

[–]Ian 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You claim that there is no evidence of any conspiracy.

I never did. I claimed there is about as much hard evidence for both arguments.

You suggest that you agree that there is a conspiracy, but don't need to provide supporting evidence.

Are you saying I should try to convince you that Epstein is involved in seriously bad shit?