you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Ian 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

I can see their point, I can also see how this can be abused to censor unwanted truths.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

Do you see their point? Are you sure???

The unwanted truths and conspiracy theories are one and the same..

Edit: I'm starting to think that Redbeard's lengthy responses are actually forum slides.

What do you guys think?

[–]Ian 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Yes.

I mean yes!!! 🤣 (You REALLY riled me up by using THREE !!!'s lmfao ufni)

I understand how propaganda and mass influence works. I understand how it can be used to control weak groups of people.

It could have someone say contradictory blanket statements like
"All conspiracy theories are real, unwanted truths".

So we both went to the moon and saw aliens WHILE at the same time we never went to the moon. Perhaps it's all a Mandela thing, that's a nice emergency explanation.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

You may have noticed that the alien videos weren't purged from YouTube.

[–]Marou 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

Exactly, they want people focused on nice harmless bullshit conspiracies like bigfoot and AYY LMAOS. Not pedo sex cults like NXIVM and Epstein, not Zionist groups that demand closed borders for Israel while simultaneously funding NGO's busy flooding the west with third world immigrants. Conspiracies in the first bucket are "cute", conspiracies in the second second can and do justifiably piss people off.

[–]magnora7 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Couldn't agree more, this is wise. If you're not anti-conspiracy (the first filter) then they want to make sure you're focused on conspiracies that don't matter or aren't provable.

The closer you get to a real truth, the more distractions there are, it seems. Every new layer of truth comes with a new framework of distractions that accompany it.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is the answer.

[–]Ian 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Exactly, they want people focused on nice harmless bullshit conspiracies like bigfoot and AYY LMAOS. Not (...)

Harmless conspiracies for now, but I don't agree they're bullshit. As far as I've seen, it's about as much hard evidence for "visitors" as it is for an intent and connection behind the examples you provide.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

It's interesting that you left out the details that are factually supported...

...pedo sex cults like NXIVM and Epstein, not Zionist groups that demand closed borders for Israel while simultaneously funding NGO's busy flooding the west with third world immigrants.

  • The pedo sex cults are real, and many involved have already been prosecuted and found guilty/confessed.
  • Israel has closed it's borders.
  • Zionist NGOs are flooding Europe with 3rd world immigrants that are fleeing the conflicts that have been fought for the Greater Israel Yinone Plan (Iraq, and Syria).

So there's plenty of evidence. The corporate media intentionally ignore the facts, and/or misrepresent them.

[–]Ian 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

It's interesting that you left out the details that are factually supported...

Yes, I didn't bother providing supporting evidence for a viewpoint we mostly share and agree on.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

As far as I've seen, it's about as much hard evidence for "visitors" as it is for an intent and connection behind the examples you provide.

You claim that there is no evidence of any conspiracy.

I didn't bother providing supporting evidence for a viewpoint we mostly share and agree on.

You suggest that you agree that there is a conspiracy, but don't need to provide supporting evidence.

I suspect that this 3 day old account was created, so you could shill.

[–]Ian 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You claim that there is no evidence of any conspiracy.

I never did. I claimed there is about as much hard evidence for both arguments.

You suggest that you agree that there is a conspiracy, but don't need to provide supporting evidence.

Are you saying I should try to convince you that Epstein is involved in seriously bad shit?