use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~5 users here now
Welcome to Sundogs Place! Please feel free to share your posts and comments on this forum. We look forward to posts that encourage open discussion, debate and learning for all.
Let the free thought flow!
Exclusive: FBI document warns conspiracy theories are a new domestic terrorism threat
submitted 4 years ago by HeyImSancho from news.yahoo.com
view the rest of the comments →
[–]Ian 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (9 children)
Yes.
I mean yes!!! 🤣 (You REALLY riled me up by using THREE !!!'s lmfao ufni)
I understand how propaganda and mass influence works. I understand how it can be used to control weak groups of people.
It could have someone say contradictory blanket statements like "All conspiracy theories are real, unwanted truths".
So we both went to the moon and saw aliens WHILE at the same time we never went to the moon. Perhaps it's all a Mandela thing, that's a nice emergency explanation.
[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (8 children)
You may have noticed that the alien videos weren't purged from YouTube.
[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun - 4 years ago (7 children)
Exactly, they want people focused on nice harmless bullshit conspiracies like bigfoot and AYY LMAOS. Not pedo sex cults like NXIVM and Epstein, not Zionist groups that demand closed borders for Israel while simultaneously funding NGO's busy flooding the west with third world immigrants. Conspiracies in the first bucket are "cute", conspiracies in the second second can and do justifiably piss people off.
[–]magnora7 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (0 children)
Couldn't agree more, this is wise. If you're not anti-conspiracy (the first filter) then they want to make sure you're focused on conspiracies that don't matter or aren't provable.
The closer you get to a real truth, the more distractions there are, it seems. Every new layer of truth comes with a new framework of distractions that accompany it.
[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (0 children)
This is the answer.
[–]Ian 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (4 children)
Exactly, they want people focused on nice harmless bullshit conspiracies like bigfoot and AYY LMAOS. Not (...)
Harmless conspiracies for now, but I don't agree they're bullshit. As far as I've seen, it's about as much hard evidence for "visitors" as it is for an intent and connection behind the examples you provide.
[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (3 children)
It's interesting that you left out the details that are factually supported...
...pedo sex cults like NXIVM and Epstein, not Zionist groups that demand closed borders for Israel while simultaneously funding NGO's busy flooding the west with third world immigrants.
So there's plenty of evidence. The corporate media intentionally ignore the facts, and/or misrepresent them.
[–]Ian 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (2 children)
Yes, I didn't bother providing supporting evidence for a viewpoint we mostly share and agree on.
[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (1 child)
As far as I've seen, it's about as much hard evidence for "visitors" as it is for an intent and connection behind the examples you provide.
You claim that there is no evidence of any conspiracy.
I didn't bother providing supporting evidence for a viewpoint we mostly share and agree on.
You suggest that you agree that there is a conspiracy, but don't need to provide supporting evidence.
I suspect that this 3 day old account was created, so you could shill.
[–]Ian 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (0 children)
I never did. I claimed there is about as much hard evidence for both arguments.
Are you saying I should try to convince you that Epstein is involved in seriously bad shit?
view the rest of the comments →
[–]Ian 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (9 children)
[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (8 children)
[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun - (7 children)
[–]magnora7 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]Ian 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (4 children)
[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (3 children)
[–]Ian 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]Ian 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)