all 4 comments

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Someone's testing the waters to evaluate public preparedness.

[–]HeyImSancho[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I would agree, but have been noting 'testing' for quite a while. It could still be a 'test', but at some point, I'd think their test(s) will go live.

What would the benefit be? Eradication of a lot of useless eaters/pond scum; say the retired, and the disabled living on fixed incomes; they don't have the money for excess. If they died 'tragically', then we could build monuments, and 'remember' them, while the govt walks away debt free from the obligation.

[–]harpskid 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

a food shortage would at-least encourage people to be more self sufficient. Always good to have some fruit and veggies growing in the yard or even in the house if you don't have a yard.

[–]HeyImSancho[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Aquaponics. We bought a couple towers on the cheap, and they put out a lot of food for such a small footprint.