use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~5 users here now
Welcome to Sundogs Place! Please feel free to share your posts and comments on this forum. We look forward to posts that encourage open discussion, debate and learning for all.
Let the free thought flow!
Bombshell! As Promised, Assange Dumps ALL Wikileaks Files – Here They Are!
submitted 4 years ago by HeyImSancho from rumormillnews.com
view the rest of the comments →
[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (8 children)
I think having a higher quality source is more important than keeping track of where you personally saw the information, just my 2 cents
[–]HeyImSancho[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (7 children)
"Higher quality"; Love that. I'm building up quite the piggy bank(2 cents;) with entirely off topic suggestions, and responses.
Life isn't fair, it's not perfect, and it comes in all flavors; we don't always get what we want, when we want it, and somethings are just uncomfortable.
I'm comfortable in my being, my life, and my style, but thanks for the suggestion. My suggestion, and I do mean this, if the manner in which I present anything, isn't up to the reader's personal expectations, then don't read, or comment on the screed I post.
It's really the secret to life, learning oneself, and being comfortable with that! :)
[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (6 children)
Well that's great and convenient for you, but not so great for everyone else who has to read the lower-quality source. Life isn't just about what you want :) This is a community
[–]HeyImSancho[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (5 children)
Right, and there are plenty of subs to hang out on. I've read where I believe it was you, that for anyone who doesn't like what someone posts, to simply block it, and presto, not seen. Is that too hard to do? I mean this thread is jacked, all off topic, am I to care? Like the saying goes, 'it takes 2 to tango'.
Let's talk 'high quality sources'. Is there a list? I've gone to RumorMillNews for a very long time. Some of there stuff I like, and a lot I don't like. I've learned to treat life like this, none of us are bound by some code to conform, or please others, or displease others. Life is a choice.
So as to the "Quality Sources", please, approved list?
[–]magnora7 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (4 children)
I mean posting from wiki leaks itself is obviously better than a place called "rumor mill"? Is that not obvious?
[–]HeyImSancho[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago* (3 children)
Did you not find 'wiki leaks' just about as fast as a click?
The sites linked to(for threads), as far as I can tell always populate to the right of all threads on the front page of the subs, or main area; if people don't like the links, don't go.
And no, I always look at substance over appearance. I'm not a libtard, or SJW, actually just 'different', having that said though, the idea of appearance over substance is a catalyst of hate; at least to myself.
In regards to 'Obvious', we're all here(I mean on Earth), to learn, grow, experience, and who knows any other purpose; perhaps the learning of time itself, is the great achievement here on this Earth.
But I'll always give credit, and I'll always look for substance over appearance.
[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (2 children)
I appreciate ya, don't worry. We all have weak spots, I'm just trying to make the best saidit I can make because this is a place for thinkers of all stripes, and it's easiest to have productive conversations when information is displayed neutrally, so I just wanted to say I think that's valuable
[–]HeyImSancho[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (1 child)
I appreciate that Magnora.
[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (0 children)
Thanks man
view the rest of the comments →
[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (8 children)
[–]HeyImSancho[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (7 children)
[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (6 children)
[–]HeyImSancho[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (5 children)
[–]magnora7 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (4 children)
[–]HeyImSancho[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (3 children)
[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–]HeyImSancho[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)