'Intimidating' signs posted near Bates College campus

submitted by SundogsPlace from (wgme.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Work2Death 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I think it has a lot more to do with the history of the phrase. Two decades is not very long. If it was a well known white supremacist saying, I think odds are the message was likely a racist one. It is what it is, man. My main gripe with this is that one retard posted these up and now all the SJWs on that campus are going to have their panties in a bunch about the neo nazi white supremacist conservative GOP epidemic in America, blowing the whole thing out of proportion.

If it's any consolation, it's pretty dumb to be proud just because you were born any color. There are literally no victims in this, including us white dudes.

[–]SundogsPlace[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

If something has a history, a long standing history, then do we continue to use it once it's labeled 'hate', or do we shun whatever that is forever? Likewise, if something isn't very old, but is labeled as 'hate' by the media, when do we stop using that? I'm thinking of the Swastika in fact; the one all over Asia today, and even Israel. Why are some allowed to use what we're taught are symbols of hate, yet others aren't?

What of the closed loop thumb, index finger, and the three other straight fingers? Is that a racist sign, and not to be used due to that? I remember the sign in the 80's simply meant 'okay', or perhaps 'cool'; yet it's taboo now.....

In regards to SJW's, and the liberal agenda, where do we stop with that? They are the product of, 'look at that giant pimple on that guy', and then the proverbial fall out effect there of. They're the creation of the mainstream media's fevered race to condemn Americana. They've been created out of a very manipulated agenda to make sure we all recognize the minute differences in all of us, that never were that big of a deal, yet now are the only deal.

As far as victims, there are always victims, survivors, and those at the end, labeled as triumphant; usually they're the dirtbags that re-write our history, and we only ever hear of the jaded, and directed history necessary to continue whatever narratives are needed.

I'll ask you a pointed question, if it's okay to have black pride, brown pride, Jewish pride, and what else on the mainstream media, then why not White pride? Whites are a global minority, yet obviously the Western world majority.

And to that point, as to my color, it doesn't matter, does it?

I see discourse across all spectrums being eliminated down to only what the official narrative will allow; which creates a reactive society; reactive societies are necessary for a Command, & Control society; militarized. How do we stop this?

[–]SundogsPlace[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

On the note of the actual saying, 'it's okay to be (whatever), with all the fevered reactionary created news, why it became prevalent. It was during the 'Black Lives Matter' debacle, where anyone who didn't like that exclusive moniker, would say, 'All Lives Matter'.... Yet, to say this, was labeled as 'hate'. Does this mean it is indeed hateful, and should also be banned?

What of the slogan, "Black Lives Matter", is that okay, and void of any racism?

[–]MojaveCoyote 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

There is nothing hateful about saying all lives matter, as a matter of fact, that's about as non-racist as it gets.

[–]SundogsPlace[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

But our media, and the NPC's following them, will absolutely say you're a hater for having that viewpoint.

The question remains, at what point, do we not allow reactive ideology to ruin freedom???? It is.

How about this, in regards to what's acceptable, or not. If we allow the continual definitive changes of our respective language, or culture, only that which is permitted will be allowed.