you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]SundogsPlace[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

So my thoughts on this article, it's another 'the privilegedwhite's made my coffee cold, burn them now'.

Here's what I do know, there's a war right now for the West, and we're all unwilling psychological participants; perhaps the 'real enemy'; the people as a whole.

They need us divided; this news is just part of what we'll be seeing.

A couple caveats to think about. We're told today with a population of around 330 million, that we need to let all immigrants in, and that there's so much abundance. Yet, on the flipside, 'whitey' was that immigrant back in the day, but there weren't 330 million indians, let alone united; no where close.

See how that's weird, immigrants in limitless numbers is good today, but back then when more sparce, 'bad'?? And caused global cooling?! give me a break.

[–]wizzwizz4 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

We're told today with a population of around 330 million, that we need to let all immigrants in, and that there's so much abundance. Yet, on the flipside, 'whitey' was that immigrant back in the day, but there weren't 330 million indians, let alone united; no where close.

  1. Who's telling you to let all immigrants in?
  2. Immigrants aren't coming in with superior weapons of destruction, in numbers sufficient to kill you and your culture.
  3. There's only abundance in some things now in the US because abundance in other things was destroyed in the past.
  4. There's a difference between conditionally letting unarmed people in and being invaded by people with more effective weapons of death.

And caused global cooling?!

  • Humans reduce forest cover (balanced out by forest growth).
  • Forest reduces carbon dioxide levels (balanced out by animals and fire and stuff).
  • Genocide reduces number of humans.
  • Fewer humans means less reduction in forest cover.
  • Less reduction in forest cover means more forest cover.
  • More forest cover means more reduction in carbon dioxide.
  • Reduction in carbon dioxide means lower temperature.

It isn't exactly rocket science. And it's plausible that the effect could be so great because America's pretty big.

They need us divided; this news is just part of what we'll be seeing.

How is this divisive? You are not your ancestors just because you look a bit like them, and anyone who says otherwise is racist.