you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]HeyImSancho[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Are you Russian? I'm fairly sure I'm not a Yankee. Is this some sort of colloquial Russian thing? To be honest, and frank, where I grew up, to be called a yankee was a very bad thing, what an irony.

What do you think of citizen journalists, or should it all stay with the networks owned by a very few?

[–]WebcomicAddiction 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Is this some sort of colloquial Russian thing?

Its my thing. Just like the word, thats all.

What do you think of citizen journalists, or should it all stay with the networks owned by a very few?

Dont really care who owns it as long as journalists follow some actual rules so that they can be as objective as possible. Right now its not a thing, unfortunately.

For example:you usually dont see any disclaimers about what type and genre of journalism those authors are practising, even tho its a very important information. Investigative journalism and opinion journalism is a two completely different things.

[–]HeyImSancho[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Is this some sort of colloquial Russian thing?

Its my thing. Just like the word, thats all.

What do you think of citizen journalists, or should it all stay with the networks owned by a very few?

Dont really care who owns it as long as journalists follow some actual rules so that they can be as objective as possible. Right now its not a thing, unfortunately.

For example:you usually dont see any disclaimers about what type and genre of journalism those authors are practising, even tho its a very important information. Investigative journalism and opinion journalism is a two completely different things.

So you want regulation, and control of the media; okay. And I'm entirely against that. The cable news, and their networks since creation, and the newspapers before that, have always been used to lie to the people.

If you want controlled media, then you'll never know anything other than what the people in control of the government at the time want you to know.

[–]WebcomicAddiction 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

So you want regulation, and control of the media; okay.

I want universal and objective guidelines. Just like scientific community has one.

If you want controlled media, then you'll never know anything other than what the people in control of the government at the time want you to know.

No shit? Really? Oh man, i didnt know that.

[–]HeyImSancho[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

So you want regulation, and control of the media; okay.

I want universal and objective guidelines. Just like scientific community has one.

If you want controlled media, then you'll never know anything other than what the people in control of the government at the time want you to know.

No shit? Really? Oh man, i didnt know that.

The scientific community? Hmmm, they are becoming a quick joke, and you want the media, already being a joke, to be set up like the 'scientific community'? hahahahahahahaha

As to the next scribble, you actually appear to sarcastically state you're for censorship of the media,, which are the people.... which is sad, as what you claim to support, that being the voices of those who you consider oppressed, as written here, and elsewhere, are also subject to censorship.

Kinda boils down to you being a good boot licking authoritarian; that's how it works after all(boot licking, sucking up, brown nosing) , there's always someone above you in the line of power, and control of your life; just as you'd subjugate those you have dominion/power over.

Hey, have at it, 'it', and more power to you!

[–]WebcomicAddiction 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

The scientific community? Hmmm, they are becoming a quick joke,

How so?

As to the next scribble, you actually appear to sarcastically state you're for censorship of the media

You are stating some rhetorical statements and im answering with sarcasm. How is it being for censorship of the media?

Kinda boils down to you being a good boot licking authoritarian;

If you are not libertarian you are an authoritarian. Gotcha.

[–]HeyImSancho[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

The scientific community? Hmmm, they are becoming a quick joke,

How so?

How so are they not? Hell, people have such little faith in the scientific community through years of lies, that a good portion of the society now believes the Earth is flat. 'how so?' LMAO

As to the next scribble, you actually appear to sarcastically state you're for censorship of the media

You are stating some rhetorical statements and im answering with sarcasm. How is it being for censorship of the media?

Kinda boils down to you being a good boot licking authoritarian;

If you are not libertarian you are an authoritarian. Gotcha.

LOL, as to the rest of your drivel, and to anyone else reading this shit, you implied you're for censorship, then admitted in another post as such, and I know your next post, will be argued with the continuing 13 year old logic. Whatever, lol

[–]WebcomicAddiction 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

a good portion

Define "a good portion".

you implied you're for censorship,

I never imply shit. I sometimes dont finish my thoughts properly cause im a lazy fuck but thats about it. Stop being libtard-alike and searching for the hidden meaning when there is none.

edit: that feeling when you cant spell libtard

edit 2: oh and:

people have such little faith in the scientific community through years of lies

Which people and which lies?

[–]HeyImSancho[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

a good portion

Define "a good portion".

https://www.sciencealert.com/one-third-millennials-believe-flat-earth-conspiracy-statistics-yougov-debunk

So I'm sure you think the search engines are okay, but I've noted that in my opinion, and many others opinion is that they're heavily manipulated. Having that said, look at the chart in that link. While they focus on 'nah uh', or 'not the case', look at how many people across all age groups are 'unsure the earth round', or what have you. Do you think the Earth is round like a ball? I mean to qualify that statement, the famous 'blue pearl' photo shows a perfect spherical ball; yet even mainstream science states it's more of a sqautty oval...... So is the science wrong, or is the picture a fraud?

There are numerous topic arenas where modern science is being called out. Robert Schock, and his dating of the Sphinx; Michael Cremo's entire practice is showing how carbon dating doesn't work; I mean there are a lot of holes in modern science; usually driven towards money, power, and the ultimate goal that knowledge is power. Yet, you use 'science' to prove why the media should be controlled, or 'moderated'.

What's wrong with good old fashion fact checking on your own? What's wrong with finding out for oneself; especially in a world where the reality truly is, that everything is subjective to the viewer/experiencer?

you implied you're for censorship,

I never imply shit. I sometimes dont finish my thoughts properly cause im a lazy fuck but thats about it. Stop being libtard-alike and searching for the hidden meaning when there is none.

So I'm debating with someone admittedly just throwing shit out there, and too lazy to formulate their thoughts, awesome!

edit: that feeling when you cant spell libtard

That maybe because as you state: "I sometimes dont finish my thoughts properly cause im a lazy fuck" .....hahahahahaha

edit 2: oh and:

people have such little faith in the scientific community through years of lies

Which people and which lies?

I think I touched on that above in the first portion of my reply.