all 22 comments

[–]Reddit_sucks_dick 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

'Liberalism is a severe mental disorder'--Michael Savage

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

No it's not. Classical Liberalism has many great principles that can be intermingled with conservatism. Michael Savage is a Russian Jew loser, who lied about 9/11 and blamed it on the Palestinians like the Zionist he is.

[–]gretathroatborg 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

classical (sic) is different from modern liberalism/progressivism. dumb nigger u seem ignorant to that reality

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Okay, but stick to the pyramid of debate, thanks.

[–]Reddit_sucks_dick 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

He was born in Brooklyn. Ancestry is irrelevant. Our GOVERNMENT lied/lies about 9/11.

As for 'Zionist', he often quotes from the Bible, and has condemned Jewish actions/atrocities many times, which you would know had you ever AKSHUALLY listened to his excellent radio show.

'Classic Liberalism' dies about 30 years ago...get with the times, Gramps.

[–]WebcomicAddiction 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

What the fuck is this site?

some actually autistic memes:

http://www.madnesshub.com/2019/10/dont-act-like-youre-above-some-dirty.html

"anti-sanders" article that somehow manages to promote his ideas(????):

http://www.madnesshub.com/2019/10/bernie-sanders-uses-heart-attack-to.html

Constant posts about trump, mild politics related twitter drama and "dunking" on popular "democratic" politicians and celebs. Not to mention the most yellow press alike clickbait i've ever seen.

Why are you linking garbage?

[–]HeyImSancho[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

Don't read the link. I link to what I read; last I checked, the MSM entirely ignores a bunch of pertinent information; there will be a lot more links, at least from myself, in search of information the establishment, and owned media ignore.

I also expect that as more citizen journalists enter the arena, there will be lots of folks bitching about how these up, and coming citizen journalists 'don't conform', and how, 'their sites don't meet some poeple's standards'.

So yeah, if you don't like what I post, simply ignore my screen name, and this sub that I post in; problem fixed, and you can go back to the network news channels, that all look the same, and that cover every topic within the given constructs allowed by the establishment.

[–]WebcomicAddiction 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

A yankee telling a russian about "media owned by establishment". What an irony.

[–]HeyImSancho[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Are you Russian? I'm fairly sure I'm not a Yankee. Is this some sort of colloquial Russian thing? To be honest, and frank, where I grew up, to be called a yankee was a very bad thing, what an irony.

What do you think of citizen journalists, or should it all stay with the networks owned by a very few?

[–]WebcomicAddiction 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Is this some sort of colloquial Russian thing?

Its my thing. Just like the word, thats all.

What do you think of citizen journalists, or should it all stay with the networks owned by a very few?

Dont really care who owns it as long as journalists follow some actual rules so that they can be as objective as possible. Right now its not a thing, unfortunately.

For example:you usually dont see any disclaimers about what type and genre of journalism those authors are practising, even tho its a very important information. Investigative journalism and opinion journalism is a two completely different things.

[–]HeyImSancho[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Is this some sort of colloquial Russian thing?

Its my thing. Just like the word, thats all.

What do you think of citizen journalists, or should it all stay with the networks owned by a very few?

Dont really care who owns it as long as journalists follow some actual rules so that they can be as objective as possible. Right now its not a thing, unfortunately.

For example:you usually dont see any disclaimers about what type and genre of journalism those authors are practising, even tho its a very important information. Investigative journalism and opinion journalism is a two completely different things.

So you want regulation, and control of the media; okay. And I'm entirely against that. The cable news, and their networks since creation, and the newspapers before that, have always been used to lie to the people.

If you want controlled media, then you'll never know anything other than what the people in control of the government at the time want you to know.

[–]WebcomicAddiction 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

So you want regulation, and control of the media; okay.

I want universal and objective guidelines. Just like scientific community has one.

If you want controlled media, then you'll never know anything other than what the people in control of the government at the time want you to know.

No shit? Really? Oh man, i didnt know that.

[–]HeyImSancho[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

So you want regulation, and control of the media; okay.

I want universal and objective guidelines. Just like scientific community has one.

If you want controlled media, then you'll never know anything other than what the people in control of the government at the time want you to know.

No shit? Really? Oh man, i didnt know that.

The scientific community? Hmmm, they are becoming a quick joke, and you want the media, already being a joke, to be set up like the 'scientific community'? hahahahahahahaha

As to the next scribble, you actually appear to sarcastically state you're for censorship of the media,, which are the people.... which is sad, as what you claim to support, that being the voices of those who you consider oppressed, as written here, and elsewhere, are also subject to censorship.

Kinda boils down to you being a good boot licking authoritarian; that's how it works after all(boot licking, sucking up, brown nosing) , there's always someone above you in the line of power, and control of your life; just as you'd subjugate those you have dominion/power over.

Hey, have at it, 'it', and more power to you!

[–]WebcomicAddiction 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

The scientific community? Hmmm, they are becoming a quick joke,

How so?

As to the next scribble, you actually appear to sarcastically state you're for censorship of the media

You are stating some rhetorical statements and im answering with sarcasm. How is it being for censorship of the media?

Kinda boils down to you being a good boot licking authoritarian;

If you are not libertarian you are an authoritarian. Gotcha.

[–]HeyImSancho[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

The scientific community? Hmmm, they are becoming a quick joke,

How so?

How so are they not? Hell, people have such little faith in the scientific community through years of lies, that a good portion of the society now believes the Earth is flat. 'how so?' LMAO

As to the next scribble, you actually appear to sarcastically state you're for censorship of the media

You are stating some rhetorical statements and im answering with sarcasm. How is it being for censorship of the media?

Kinda boils down to you being a good boot licking authoritarian;

If you are not libertarian you are an authoritarian. Gotcha.

LOL, as to the rest of your drivel, and to anyone else reading this shit, you implied you're for censorship, then admitted in another post as such, and I know your next post, will be argued with the continuing 13 year old logic. Whatever, lol

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

It's unclear when the case records will be unsealed. Smollett's lawyers had no comment Thursday.

This narrative is a psyop. A Hoax within a hoax. A mind fuckery of mass proportions. An Actor playing a part in a kangaroo court psyop.

[–]gretathroatborg 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

nice handwaving faggot. it's simple, an overpaid nigger filed a false police report at a time when niggers and jews in congress were trying to ram through a bill related to lynching. hence the silly rope necktie the nigger ape added to his "performance"

[–]HeyImSancho[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

? I skimmed the article, it was about a WSU prof. stating Sponge Bob Square pants was evil, and white hatred.... I must of missed the part about smullet, but don't see a hoax in what a professor says.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Didn't read it but saw smullet, and had to comment on him. The professor on the other hand, Imm dumbfounded. But none of my professors were ever like this, so I wonder how common this sort of bizarre behavior really is?

[–]HeyImSancho[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Uh, well, it's very common. Actually, WSU is somewhat famous for making ridiculous statements. One English professor thought that teaching English was a point of 'privilege', so allowed all sorts of shit to fly for 'English'.

Think about that, English is the international language of shipping, and communication.