Studies find Wikipedia has liberal bias

submitted by EvilNick from newsmax.com

all 11 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]bjam27 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

Wikipedia is revisionist trash.

[–]JasonCarswell 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Actually, it's not revisionist. That would be better.

Wikipedia echoes the "official" narrative™, which is much worse.

[–]EvilNick[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I remember Elias Yale was a slave trader on wikipedia. lol after the rename Yale push all of a sudden wiki pulled that out and revised it. Wiki is garbage.

[–]BigFatRetard 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Wikipedia can absolutely be a fantastic resource as long as you stay away from stuff that's been politicized. Unfortunately, a lot of stuff has been politicized.

[–]christnmusicreleases 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Indeed. Most my informational edits have been removed by activists.

[–]EvilNick[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They get edited then locked down. Maybe we need a conservative version?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

In other breaking news, scientists discover water found to be wet.

[–]EvilNick[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Lol

[–]RM-Goetbbels 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

nooo, no way. uh uh. not a chance.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

"5. The Critic: Right-Wing Editors 6 Times More Likely to Be Sanctioned"

I'm curious to know, how many truth-seeking / conspiracy / corruption-deepstate-exposing / counter-narrative editors have been sanctioned?