They did this for the last election and for the Covid Vaccine.

Twitter Files Drop, we find an email where Isabella Garcia-Camargo apologizes for copying the wrong social media company into her Covid Vaccine risk censorship email.

I listened to an interview of her (Youtube audio), describing how she also spearheaded efforts to hide election problems in 2020.

She talked about how CISA basically "runs US elections," while taking of them taking young and dumb students on as fresh meat. (Cyber Infrastructure Security Administration or something to that affect)

She said she was just starting her career in 2016, while repeating the now-debunked "foreign elections interference" line.

She recounts how, in 2020, the EIP Election Integrity Partnership, working with many social media and corporate partners, spun up 100 days before election, starting in August. How they were online 24h hours a day, writing tweets and blog posts, to counter concerns about the 2020 election.

Remember, social media corporations were loudly threatened repeatedly that they were about to be crushed with anti-monopoly regulation...until they played ball to sway the election. Now, we haven't heard a peep about breaking up big tech.

Like this Virality Project partnership, which uses a censorship and social media to destroy free speech about Covid vaccine injuries, misinforming people like myself into long term disability, I assume they blackmailed social media companies into censorship and propagandizing certain narratives and candidates as good/bad during the election.

Isabella Garcia-Camargo, about the 2020 election concerns (personally transcribe, please forgive any errors):

"It was organic. It was.. People were finding the evidence themselves, like framing it and networking with each other, to understand and build up these conspiracies. And um.. it felt pretty helpless at a lot of points. It was just kind of like, what, what am I going to say to these people, right? There's scaffolding...the scaffolding was a big problem there, where no matter what, the underlying assumption was: We are looking for evidence of fraud and we are looking to show how this is going to be a stolen election, right?"

She is apparently a naive and unsuspecting censorship and dissinfo lead apparently.