Fox Hosts RAIL Against Free School Lunch For Children

submitted by [deleted] from youtube.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

School lunches will never be good.

It's better than starving. I know first-hand how crappy it can be, but I'd rather eat a piece of square pizza that tastes like card-board than go all day hungry.

Far better to get families to learn and provide healthy food on the cheap which suits their kid's individual needs.

Some of them can't, because they're poor, or won't, because they're too busy shooting up meth. I've known a lot of kids who relied on free school lunches (back when they were determined by income) and plenty of kids who were denied free lunches, but couldn't afford to buy them.

In neither case is it the child's fault, in neither case should the child be punished, in neither case should the child go hungry. I know way too many children who had to go hungry for one reason or another, and it pisses me off when people say they don't deserve to eat.

But that's difficult and dosen't give liberals instant good feelz.

And it leaves kids hungry.

And no, not everyone who supports this is a Liberal; there are plenty of Conservatives, like me, who actually care about family values rather than shilling for billionaires — yanno, the people pushing abortion, open borders, and other liberal agenda.

It also highlights which kids are being abused and neglected which upsets the notion poor kids fail due to finances alone, we can't have that.

So you're fine with kids starving just so you can own the libs?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

No one wants to say it, but deep down we're thinking, the family is poor but they could feed their kid if they worked hard, they are just lazy, and they likely dropped that bad genetic material to the kid, so the kid will grow up to be lazy and stupid, and if we don't feed the kid maybe he will die or at least not pass on his genetic material.

[–]tyranicaloverlord 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Agreed. You give them the opportunity to take advantage of a handout, they will allocate their use of money elsewhere. All too often people think that they are deserved luxuries such as cable TV, internet, cell phones. When in any capacity you can do without if you really wanted to be independent. It just doesn't happen, and there is enough proof to show that handouts do nothing but enable people to be leeches.

At one point in history churches picked up this slack, that's why they got tax exemption. Churches do all of fuck-all now.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

At one point years ago I used to think "we have the technology and ability to make heaven on earth, no one needs to go hungry, if we withold from the poor because of our own moral judgement it is needless and evil"

Years later I changed my mind. We should make it hard on people so that they rise up and work hard, that is the morally right thing to do, although it sounds bad and no one wants to say it. It sounds Ebenezer Scrooge-ish. It's kind of like what nazis would say or it is similar to eugenics and those things got a lot of bad press to say the least so if anyone says it out loud they will be unpersoned.

[–]tyranicaloverlord 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You are right, I'm with you on this.

There is only one perfect society, the utopia is communism MINUS human nature.

Until we eliminate our humanity within us, capitalism the best government ever tried. If there was a better way, I'd be the first in line.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

society will never be perfect but that can't mean we don't try to improve it