Saidit.net Canary #17

submitted by magnora7 from (self.SaiditCanary)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Anon40percent 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (11 children)

You say this but you removed Ice Poseidon 2.

[–]Layman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

I believe that May be Evidence of a “free speech prohibiting sanction”. Could it be?

[–]bobbobbybob 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (8 children)

not at all "absolutely cockball prohibition" seems more like it. A bunch of hobos moved into the basement, then decided to use the place to annoy the world, then took the piss when we asked them to settle. Good riddance

[–]Layman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

It appears the removal was due to failure to conform to censorship. Is there any evidence to the contrary?

[–]bobbobbybob 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

you are asking me to disprove an unproven supposition.

You prove it was due to censorship....

Then I'll get off my arse and prove you wrong, which is easy, as its all documented.

You are the one who has to prove your position.

[–]Layman 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

I believe I am asking for discovery. Any one kind enough to help out?

[–]Zahn 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

They had doxxed and/or were harassing someone irl...something...something, the hosting company got involved with the complaint.

But yeah, Boobob summed it up more creatively.

[–]bobbobbybob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

they even went nicely, in the end. Found their own server, free of silly things like 'site rules'. good on them.

[–]Layman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

who specifically is they? what was the form and nature of the alleged harassment?

[–]Zahn 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

I don't know exactly who "they" were. I would guess just a handful of bad actors, not necessarily regular members of Ip2. Nor do I know the nature of the doxxing and harassment. They complained to Saidit's host, which in turn threatened to shut down Saidit unless Ip2 was removed. Hosting companies are stupid.

I'm sure Mags knows all the juicy details.

[–]Layman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The courtesy is appreciated. It seems the public domain is lacking firsthand testimony.

[–]SaidOverRed 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No. It was a practical move, although yes that is pretty close to the line: 'sorry guys you have to go elsewhere'. Basically it was the only way to be accepted at our hosting company, as I understand it. It had nothing to do with divulging information.