Can Someone Make A Debunking Sub?

submitted by CompleteDoubter from self.SaidIt

Hello. I'm rather concerned by the lack of a debunking sub. There are many conspiracy subs, like climate skeptics and vaccine skeptics, but there's not many skeptic subs around. It's worrying, because I don't think this site currently has both sides of both information for and against conspiracies.

all 8 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]Tom_Bombadil 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Evidence theorists are welcome here.

[–]Optimus85 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Just created /s/Debunking so you can post to your heart's content! I will gladly waive my moderator status and let you moderate this sub and modify it to your liking.

[–]Global_Originalist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

How do you make a sub on saidit? Do you have any idea?

[–]CompleteDoubter[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Don't really know, but your account has to be 2 weeks old to make one, which is why I haven't made it myself.

[–]Global_Originalist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Have some patience friend. Two weeks is nothing. Thanks for the info too!

[–]Optimus85 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's as simple as posting a link. When your account is 2 weeks old you'll see a tab under ' Submit a new link'(on the right of the screen above the IRC chat box) which will enable you to create a sub.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

just remember, coverups always prove conspiracy theories

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Every conspiracy needs as much debunking as theories if not more. They are two sides of the same coin. For every conspiracy there should be inbuilt skepticism and debunking. It's just semantics, not a lack of debunking.