you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Troll[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

I extend the invitation to you, as well.

[–]magnora7 8 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 4 fun -  (3 children)

Is that before or after you called me a "fucking fraud"?

Second warning.

[–]DefinitelyAJew 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Hey I'm just a bystander but I feel like you take it too personally if you want to be the head of the site. People who complain and insult will always bombard the higher-ups. That said though, if you ban subsaidits without a warning, what makes you different from reddit? I'm not tossing any shit here.

[–]Troll[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I think the biggest thing that screams, "please treat me like a victim" is the fact those saidit subsaidits were not getting any traffic, but were banned anyways. So it has nothing to do with the "pyramid of debate" It has to do with someone's feelings, and someone's opinions. So, there was no problem, and somebody had to find a solution because of feels.

Reddit TRIES to make it look like subreddits broke the rules, when they haven't. This place just goes and deletes them because of BOTH feelings and lies. He's more than welcome to go and google /r/coontown and search for the announcement thread of its banning on reddit -- both Pao and Huffshit admitted that it broke no rules (claiming he banned it because it was bad for ads).

[–]magnora7 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The amount of traffic a sub gets has nothing to do with where it sits on the pyramid of debate...