you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

This pyramid obsession stuff is illuminati tier, tho.

[–]Mnemonic 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

The Egyptians and Greeks did it way before the The Bavarian Illuminati was even conceived.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

They just stole it along with a bunch of other stuff from a high developed and educated race with hooves and horns that has left from this planet a long time ago. Every cow on earth that lives as a slave of any kind under human hands is forced to get "signed" with a mark to this very day.

[–]magnora7 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Yeah I guess the food pyramid and trigonometry are Illuminati too /s

The pyramid of debate was created in 2006.

[–]Stankmango 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

If we're going to punctuate our obvious sarcasm with that beetling proverbial mark can't we at least start doing /r instead, just to spite Reddit and restore a modicum of balance in this heat?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

They are. There is no need for that /s.

edit: if you have to explain sarcasm with an /s, it is no sarcasm anymore

[–]magnora7 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

/s is required because of Poe's Law

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe%27s_law

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That means sarcasm is just impossible on the internet, since sarcasm stops being sarcasm when one has to explain it as such. /s

You can even use it the other way around and acting as if you were joking though you aren't. /s

Think I will use it all the time now. /s

haha /s