you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]wizzwizz4[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I know it says it. It says it in the version that's in law. But it was taken out of context, and twisted to mean something else.

[–]swordofdamocles42 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

not at all.

the original context was alluding to the fact that jews have too much power in the USA.

just the fact that this bill was proposed confirms that. never mind it actually got passed into law.. albiet watered down. but still....

[–]wizzwizz4[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

the original context was alluding to the fact that jews have too much power in the USA.

  • I don't consider this claim to be true, fwiw. That aside:
  • I think we're using different meanings of "context", here. My "original context" is the one in the published law from which the text is taken.