Issue regarding the pornographic rule

submitted by HorseMeat from self.SaidIt

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]fred_red_beans 15 insightful - 2 fun15 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

I think for Saidit to not end up where Reddit and Voat have, some boundaries have to be drawn. In addition to the debate pyramid, pornography is one of those boundaries set by the developers (who have not been profit driven) to help set the tone of discourse.

I support not having porn on Saidit.

[–][deleted]  (7 children)

[removed]

    [–]magnora7 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Please respect the pyramid of debate on saidit or you're banned. https://saidit.net/s/SaidIt/comments/j1/the_saiditnet_terms_and_content_policy/

    Last warning.

    [–]faggotnigger 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    No. Your pyramid is lame and I will not respect it.

    [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

    Reported

    [–][deleted]  (3 children)

    [removed]

      [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

      Also reported. You need a hug man?

      [–][deleted]  (1 child)

      [removed]

        [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

        Well I didn't need to until that last "fag". Reported.

        You must have serious daddy issues if you think hugs are gay or even sexual.