you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]poestal 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

could you delve more into your definition of toxic users.

[–]wizzwizz4[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (11 children)

There aren't many. I'll just namedrop Martin and let some others explain.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

Looking back on that debate I can see the problem-solution-reaction strategy at work.

You even submitted the "SaidIt is becoming an echo chamber" idea.

Once again you've managed to stir things up.

You have been working at chipping away at this forum for some time.

[–]wizzwizz4[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

You have been working at chipping away at this forum for some time.

I hope not. Either what I'm saying is true, and thus what I'm chipping away at needs to be chipped away so it can be replaced by something better, or what I'm saying is false and should be quickly and immediately argued against.

That which can be destroyed by the truth should be. But I don't think Saidit is one of those things.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

Who crafted that pith for you?

[–]wizzwizz4[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Face it. I'm not acting like a shill would.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

You are.

[–]wizzwizz4[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Would a shill help to write the software running the site? If I can do that, I wouldn't need to be a shill because I could just get a job programming.

I still don't know why you make an exception to the debate pyramid to call me names.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

A shill would love to do that.

Getting access to the software would prove invaluable if some group wants to hack the system and find information about community members.

[–]wizzwizz4[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

… It's always been open source. Look at the link right at the bottom of the page.

You've conclusively concluded that I'm a shill and are now rationalising that. There's nothing I can possibly say to convince you, because your prior is 1 and it requires infinite evidence to change that.