Socks is still sabotaging these forums with his glowniggering. This account was created two weeks ago and everything he has done since has been to flame and insult random users, drag down the pyramid of discussion and mass upvote his own comments with his other alts.

submitted by EternalSunset from i.imgur.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Who cares? He’s funny as fuck. There’s no users who it’s okay to ban.

If you hate him so much, BLOCK him.

This is part of being on a platform that has free speech.

[–]jet199 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

No, it's fine to ban users who promote violence, as Socks does often.

[–]POOPCORN 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Banning is not an effective way to deal with undesirable people and I should know that better than anyone because it takes all of 2 minutes to register another account.

I do find it interesting that saidit seems to be working as well as it does even though it doesn't aggressively block people from establishing a new account after being banned.