Socks is still sabotaging these forums with his glowniggering. This account was created two weeks ago and everything he has done since has been to flame and insult random users, drag down the pyramid of discussion and mass upvote his own comments with his other alts.

submitted by EternalSunset from i.imgur.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]jet199 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

No, it's fine to ban users who promote violence, as Socks does often.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I think a warning is sufficient. And block him and his associated accounts.

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

This is not a free speech platform, and you didn't see his very specific threats against Cucker Tarlson, did you?

[–][deleted] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

No. I don’t know exactly what you are talking about.

If they’re like specific threats or planning, that has to be stopped. I don’t know what to do in that instance.

I just know I don’t want to be banned for my thoughts or words like I was on Reddit.

Like first tucker carelson, and then next I’m getting banned for calling someone a cuck.

I am concerned about my liberties on this platform.

[–]TortureTucker 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Excellent points. /u/being-poisoned is a traitor, much like Carlson.

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Socks here is just pissed that I'm voting for RFKJr2024