you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (35 children)

Who cares? He’s funny as fuck. There’s no users who it’s okay to ban.

If you hate him so much, BLOCK him.

This is part of being on a platform that has free speech.

[–]EternalSunset[S] 9 insightful - 5 fun9 insightful - 4 fun10 insightful - 5 fun -  (1 child)

^ Account created 21 days ago.

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That is not an argument. You have only been here a year, you are a baby.

[–]jet199 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (31 children)

No, it's fine to ban users who promote violence, as Socks does often.

[–]POOPCORN 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Banning is not an effective way to deal with undesirable people and I should know that better than anyone because it takes all of 2 minutes to register another account.

I do find it interesting that saidit seems to be working as well as it does even though it doesn't aggressively block people from establishing a new account after being banned.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (22 children)

I think a warning is sufficient. And block him and his associated accounts.

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (19 children)

This is not a free speech platform, and you didn't see his very specific threats against Cucker Tarlson, did you?

[–][deleted] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

No. I don’t know exactly what you are talking about.

If they’re like specific threats or planning, that has to be stopped. I don’t know what to do in that instance.

I just know I don’t want to be banned for my thoughts or words like I was on Reddit.

Like first tucker carelson, and then next I’m getting banned for calling someone a cuck.

I am concerned about my liberties on this platform.

[–]TortureTucker 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Excellent points. /u/being-poisoned is a traitor, much like Carlson.

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Socks here is just pissed that I'm voting for RFKJr2024

[–][deleted]  (15 children)

[removed]

    [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (12 children)

    Carlson began his media career in the 1990s, writing for The Weekly Standard and other publications. He was a CNN commentator from 2000 to 2005 and a co-host of the network's prime-time news debate program Crossfire from 2001 to 2005. From 2005 to 2008, he hosted the nightly program Tucker on MSNBC.

    Get rekt you dumb bastard

    [–][deleted]  (8 children)

    [removed]

      [–]magnora7 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

      Do not advocate violence on saidit.

      [–]dik 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

      Did you ban this person (who advocates violence regularly, especially to me)?:

      SMCAB 1 insightful - 0 fun - 16 hours ago*

      Lol? I love it when you expose yourself as a teenage girl. What a faggot!

      If I was in the KKK I would have hung your nigger ass already. Dumbfuck.

      My guess is that you've not banned him. Instead, you can see that one or two voices who challenge the extreme racisim here generate A LOT of engagement and traffic. You wrote something like this a long time ago. The racist circle jerk you've otherwise developed will remain small, stupid, and mean-spirited. Nothing of value or interest can come of a website that censors its one or two dissenting voices, while also claiming to promote free speech. In 2 years I've seen Saidit kill itself, partially thanks to the way you've managed it. I've also learned how much of a traitor /u/being-poisoned is in recent days. He knows how much Saiditors promote violence regularly, so my comment about what Tucker deserves for his role in dividing the US was an attempt to see if BP would be a hypocrite (to focus on me instead of the others), and it worked. There's not much left on Saidit that's laudible and interesting. Discussions and arguments on controversial subjects would work at Saidit and when that's happened, I and others have generated so much traffic and interest in the website (by contrast to your refusal to do anything here). You and some others keep the SMCABs and Oyveygoyims, and censor those who disagree with constant front-page posts focused only on hatred and false comparisons. You can help Saidit develop, by encouraging a few of the interesting users, and the others will follow. Or you can watch Saidit continue to decline as a mean and stupid cesspit. If the latter, you are wasting your money.

      [–]SMCAB 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

      I so fuuucking love soooo fuuuuuucking hard that you're talking about me right now. Keep going! I'm about to cum!

      You are such a crybaby little faggot.

      [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      Fine work here, advocating violence and getting yourself banned. I guess you and Tucker have a lot in common after all.

      [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

      What's wrong with the GOP? Are you an anti-semite?

      [–]TortureTucker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

      Another example of you being a traitor to those around you.

      [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

      this is called presenting evidence for my argument, nig

      [–]TortureTucker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      no - it's just you being a traitor - nothing more

      this isn't important at Saidit; but it is generally significant

      [–]magnora7 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      Do not advocate violence on saidit.

      [–]POOPCORN 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      One time sucks probably threatened to ruin my reparations in this forum he said that he would destroy me.

      I should have reported him before it was too late but I was scared

      [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      You were scared of what?

      [–][deleted]  (5 children)

      [deleted]

        [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

        [–][deleted]  (3 children)

        [deleted]

          [–][deleted] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

          so you admit to promoting violence... ur banned bud

          [–][deleted]  (1 child)

          [deleted]

            [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

            im so happy that your balls finally dropped. peach it brother.

            [–]TortureTucker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

            as Socks does often.

            Not true, Jet. You're a traitor.