use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~4 users here now
This is Saidit's main sub for things related to the saidit.net website itself.
If you need help with using this website or related tools, post in /s/help. If you want a place to post any topic to the community, try /s/whatever or /s/asksaidit. If you want to create a wiki page, use /s/wiki.
/u/HongKongPooey posts too much thrashy clickbait links.
submitted 1 year ago by LarrySwinger2 from self.SaidIt
view the rest of the comments →
[–][deleted] 13 insightful - 2 fun13 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 2 fun - 1 year ago (5 children)
I just posted two links about police misconduct and a woman that was denied an organ transplant for being unvaccinated, but Saidit won't vote those to the top like my semen post, its literally the #1 post right now, so I'm not sure Saidit agrees
[–]Questionable 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun - 1 year ago (4 children)
Are up votes that important to you? How would it look if we could down vote content?
Here is a sample of what you deem appropriate content for saidit:
'My sugar daddy paid me to feed him my used toilet paper — you'd do it too'
You are actively creating this environment. You can not claim innocence in this.
[–]RottenCorpse 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (3 children)
I support Phooey's innocence. People enjoy comedy and variety, else it becomes an echochamber of political gesturing. These posts wouldn't be popular unless they were appreciated.
What is appropriate for a platform that proclaims freedom of speech and expression, is anything within the confines on the rules. Linking to publications from mainstream media articles of that nature demonstrates that those types of posts are appropriate content for newspapers, how so then is it inappropriate here? Are we a holier than thou, modest sainthood of patrons? No, we are internet dweebs who enjoy the company of others internet bullshit and banter for shits n giggles.
[–]Alphix 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun - 1 year ago (2 children)
Wait, the dailymail.co.uk site is another babylonbee? I thought it was serious (and seriously fucked up and disgusting and gross) "news."
Given this, I found his appetite for sharing the shit-slinging level stories he posts to be very much like an attempt at degrading our site.
More babylonbee, less dailymail?
[–]dicknipples 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (1 child)
seriously fucked up and disgusting and gross
yup
less of both the Bee and Mail, but I support those who want to contribute a variety of submissions, which HKP does.
[–]Questionable 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun - 1 year ago* (0 children)
Of course you want less bee. Comedy derails propaganda and detracts from degeneracy.
view the rest of the comments →
[–][deleted] 13 insightful - 2 fun13 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 2 fun - (5 children)
[–]Questionable 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun - (4 children)
[–]RottenCorpse 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun - (3 children)
[–]Alphix 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun - (2 children)
[–]dicknipples 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]Questionable 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun - (0 children)