/u/HongKongPooey posts too much thrashy clickbait links.

submitted by LarrySwinger2 from self.SaidIt

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 13 insightful - 2 fun13 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

I just posted two links about police misconduct and a woman that was denied an organ transplant for being unvaccinated, but Saidit won't vote those to the top like my semen post, its literally the #1 post right now, so I'm not sure Saidit agrees

[–]Questionable 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

Are up votes that important to you? How would it look if we could down vote content?

Here is a sample of what you deem appropriate content for saidit:

'My sugar daddy paid me to feed him my used toilet paper — you'd do it too'

You are actively creating this environment. You can not claim innocence in this.

[–]RottenCorpse 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

I support Phooey's innocence. People enjoy comedy and variety, else it becomes an echochamber of political gesturing. These posts wouldn't be popular unless they were appreciated.

What is appropriate for a platform that proclaims freedom of speech and expression, is anything within the confines on the rules. Linking to publications from mainstream media articles of that nature demonstrates that those types of posts are appropriate content for newspapers, how so then is it inappropriate here? Are we a holier than thou, modest sainthood of patrons? No, we are internet dweebs who enjoy the company of others internet bullshit and banter for shits n giggles.

[–]Questionable 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

The innocent of his active actions of which are facts?

A defense of simply claiming comedy?

An appreciation for incest and beastiality stories?

A claim of popularity, where one can not down vote?

A defense of popularity equating to rightness?

A self proclamation of having no morals to stand on?

Well, I'll give you this much. It all read very well!

Too bad none of it makes for a very convincing argument.

[–]RottenCorpse 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Well I guess everyone can ask you for your opinion before posting anything in case it doesn't meet your approval?

[–]Questionable 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

I don't spam the front page with low brow smut. Nor do I walk into a walmart and start reading porn out loud. It's a public forum, not a public toilet. And no, it's not appropriate behavior for a public bathroom either, but there is no such thing as an all ages whore house, so I can't compare it to such. All ages drag shows? That's a thing that exists. I can compare it to that.

[–]RottenCorpse 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

How dare you speak of smut in that way, low brow smut is what I live for! Have you no shame? If one wishes to compare ones penis to a vegetable or watch midget wrestling then so be it man! Leave the smut readers alone for we have needs too! Not all visitors to this public forum seek to reside in a censorious realm of monotonous dribble spouted by those without humour, irony or jest, who's sole contributions tend towards nursery rhymes and conflict instigation. You sir are the toilet seat, I sit on you!

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

That was actually your most conniving argument. And you implemented a comedic tone. kudos to you.