you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Just my personal opinion, but I think we may be looking at a couple of different phenomenon.

The 'L' and 'G' may have some biological basis, we see it in animals at similar rates to what we see in humans. Lesbians seem to have really masculine physical traits at much higher rates than one would expect given zero correlation between biology and sexuality.

The gender ideology stuff is clearly psycho-social in origin and not biological (gender is determined by the presence or lack of the male Y chromosome in mammals), although perhaps some inherent level of higher suggestibility is required to be susceptible to this stuff, because not everyone is

[–]Ehhhhhh 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I've wondered if some gays claim trans because it gets more attn than gay/lesbian or if it's some mental exercise.

Example: This girl that I knew was super cute. She had a slightly deeper voice but still feminine. She loved her husband and was sort of naive about the world in general and was in a region that was more religious than others.

She went trans. Like, total wtf. How did sweet little naive girl end up on hrt, change her name and move to a super liberal, degenerate city? Was she secretly into chicks and just trans was more supported? Was being gay more of a sin to her than just "being born in the wrong body"?

Still bugs me on how that could've happened and doesn't make a lot of sense.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Nah, straight people go trans at a higher rate than gays or dykes. I guess it's possible that she was secretly into chicks but not likely