/u/HongKongPooey posts too much thrashy clickbait links.

submitted by LarrySwinger2 from self.SaidIt

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 13 insightful - 2 fun13 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 2 fun -  (21 children)

I just posted two links about police misconduct and a woman that was denied an organ transplant for being unvaccinated, but Saidit won't vote those to the top like my semen post, its literally the #1 post right now, so I'm not sure Saidit agrees

[–]JasonCarswell 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Others have rigged the votes.
Others have voted for stupider shit.
Hard to say what's what.

The real issue is that your lame shitposts are too prolific.

[–]dicknipples 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (8 children)

That seamen post is of course important news to Saidit (though the research is 20 years old), so we are much obliged. But it doesn't mention semen in gay men. I mean: perhaps that's the origin of the use of the name, gay? Just thinking out loud....

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

(though the research is 20 years old), so we are much obliged. But it doesn't mention semen in gay men.

I think you have already provided the answer right there and perhaps didn't realize it during your out loud thinking. The article predates the woke drive towards inclusive language, it is implicitly assumed that heterosexuality is necessarily the biological norm, and that males retaining the semen of others in not worth studying without a plausible evolutionary reason for why nature would select for this in males

[–]dicknipples 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Indeed - though arguably the 2SLGBTQIA+ folks are happily removing themselves from the breeder gene pool, so technically Idiocracy will have a paucity of 2SLGBTQIA+ genes (if we are to believe the 2SLGBTQIA+ community that their conditions are innate). (Edit: as it may not seem to be obvious, now as I read responses to this and my previous comment, I should note - I was obviously joking with HKP.)

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Just my personal opinion, but I think we may be looking at a couple of different phenomenon.

The 'L' and 'G' may have some biological basis, we see it in animals at similar rates to what we see in humans. Lesbians seem to have really masculine physical traits at much higher rates than one would expect given zero correlation between biology and sexuality.

The gender ideology stuff is clearly psycho-social in origin and not biological (gender is determined by the presence or lack of the male Y chromosome in mammals), although perhaps some inherent level of higher suggestibility is required to be susceptible to this stuff, because not everyone is

[–]Ehhhhhh 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I've wondered if some gays claim trans because it gets more attn than gay/lesbian or if it's some mental exercise.

Example: This girl that I knew was super cute. She had a slightly deeper voice but still feminine. She loved her husband and was sort of naive about the world in general and was in a region that was more religious than others.

She went trans. Like, total wtf. How did sweet little naive girl end up on hrt, change her name and move to a super liberal, degenerate city? Was she secretly into chicks and just trans was more supported? Was being gay more of a sin to her than just "being born in the wrong body"?

Still bugs me on how that could've happened and doesn't make a lot of sense.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Nah, straight people go trans at a higher rate than gays or dykes. I guess it's possible that she was secretly into chicks but not likely

[–]hfxB0oyA 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

2SLGB...

I'm suspecting you're Canadian?

[–]dicknipples 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I found it online. Just trying to stay up to date. I haven't a clue what a Two-Spirit person from Turtle Island is. (Not Canadian.)

[–]hfxB0oyA 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Haha - It seems to be something that mostly just we Canadians use. 2 spirit basically just means trans for indigenous people. Since we've got a history of treating our indigenous people the way the US treats its black people, it's lately been put at the head of the LGB stack as an honorific.

[–]Questionable 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (9 children)

Are up votes that important to you? How would it look if we could down vote content?

Here is a sample of what you deem appropriate content for saidit:

'My sugar daddy paid me to feed him my used toilet paper — you'd do it too'

You are actively creating this environment. You can not claim innocence in this.

[–]RottenCorpse 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

I support Phooey's innocence. People enjoy comedy and variety, else it becomes an echochamber of political gesturing. These posts wouldn't be popular unless they were appreciated.

What is appropriate for a platform that proclaims freedom of speech and expression, is anything within the confines on the rules. Linking to publications from mainstream media articles of that nature demonstrates that those types of posts are appropriate content for newspapers, how so then is it inappropriate here? Are we a holier than thou, modest sainthood of patrons? No, we are internet dweebs who enjoy the company of others internet bullshit and banter for shits n giggles.

[–]Alphix 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Wait, the dailymail.co.uk site is another babylonbee? I thought it was serious (and seriously fucked up and disgusting and gross) "news."

Given this, I found his appetite for sharing the shit-slinging level stories he posts to be very much like an attempt at degrading our site.

More babylonbee, less dailymail?

[–]dicknipples 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

seriously fucked up and disgusting and gross

yup

less of both the Bee and Mail, but I support those who want to contribute a variety of submissions, which HKP does.

[–]Questionable 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Of course you want less bee. Comedy derails propaganda and detracts from degeneracy.

[–]Questionable 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

The innocent of his active actions of which are facts?

A defense of simply claiming comedy?

An appreciation for incest and beastiality stories?

A claim of popularity, where one can not down vote?

A defense of popularity equating to rightness?

A self proclamation of having no morals to stand on?

Well, I'll give you this much. It all read very well!

Too bad none of it makes for a very convincing argument.

[–]RottenCorpse 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Well I guess everyone can ask you for your opinion before posting anything in case it doesn't meet your approval?

[–]Questionable 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

I don't spam the front page with low brow smut. Nor do I walk into a walmart and start reading porn out loud. It's a public forum, not a public toilet. And no, it's not appropriate behavior for a public bathroom either, but there is no such thing as an all ages whore house, so I can't compare it to such. All ages drag shows? That's a thing that exists. I can compare it to that.

[–]RottenCorpse 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

How dare you speak of smut in that way, low brow smut is what I live for! Have you no shame? If one wishes to compare ones penis to a vegetable or watch midget wrestling then so be it man! Leave the smut readers alone for we have needs too! Not all visitors to this public forum seek to reside in a censorious realm of monotonous dribble spouted by those without humour, irony or jest, who's sole contributions tend towards nursery rhymes and conflict instigation. You sir are the toilet seat, I sit on you!

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

That was actually your most conniving argument. And you implemented a comedic tone. kudos to you.

[–]Drewski 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah the community is just as much to blame for upvoting it. It's also possible Saidit's detractors upvote this kind of post to keep legitimate content off the front page.