It's a strawman to point at a real piece of legislation and say it proves your conspiracy. Actually it's a stone man? An ironman? Because the legislation is real and your conspiracy isn't.

But again you're looking to change the topic which means I think you're conceding that you were wrong about the death certificates. If you want to talk about other things like the quality of different pieces of law, then maybe you should just indicate so by saying "I was wrong to believe an article citing those two dipshits, some misrepresented comments from Illinois state, and a weirdo qanon state senator"