you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Canbot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Public discussion is never pointless.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

So you simulate being braindead. There is no discussion. There is no debate.

There only is dialogue.

[–]Canbot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

You made claims, the I explained why those claims are wrong. You lost the discussion and that is why you have turned to name calling. Your claim that there was no discussion or debate is also fallacious. Anyone can read through this thread and see that your ideas are wrong, that you are a fool, and that you are a low class name caller and not an intellectual.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Anyone in your simulation surely can.

You even don't understand what a logical fallacy actually is. Because your simulation hasn't the sourcecode for it. You never searched and conclusively never found it. Also you never started to evaluate your own language. So keep on living in your Matrix and deriving judgements from it. Going this way again and again you never break out of it. I don't even need to believe this. It is a logical conclusion.

But it is invisible in your simulation.

[–]CreditKnifeMan 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Easy now, bro.

The matrix isn't forgiving, or easy to figure out.

Jeez. Us.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

True. It is hard to digest and very injust at the same time, if you're born on the wrong end of this stick. Like most humans plausibly are. Ticks mostly only breed ticks. Because if they breed a bobblehead out of the blue they streamline it very fast into an really nasty abomination.

Like G.W. Bush. He was such an abomination, i'm almost sure.