you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]send_nasty_stuff 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

[–][deleted]  (6 children)

[deleted]

    [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

    Have you ever checked the veracity of a Wikipedia article?

    [–]kisses 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    happens all the time - important to check the footnotes and look at those sources

    the biggest errors are usually missing details or paraphrasing from sources written by non-specialists

    [–]EuropeanAwakening14 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Lol. Yeah, it's totally not completely biased moderators and article writing and sourcing quotes from "specialists" expressing their political opinions as fact and getting away with it because it's not a primary source. Any establishment paper or institution can write an article full of false claims and it can be cited. It's a completely circular, fraudulent system when it comes to any article that's of any political importance or has controversy.

    [–]EuropeanAwakening14 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    I bet you would never dare call a tranny or a black a goober. Pathetic.