We Need to Talk About the Chat Operator Status

submitted by Jackalope from self.SaidIt

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]usehername 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

MANY folks agree, largely other voices that have earned the respect of our community.

Jack is a very respected user and here you are disparaging him for disagreeing with you. In fact, I've never seen anyone defend your conduct.

You're proving my point that when there is no power structure, someone will attempt to create an authoritarian one by force. And unfortunately, this time it's you.

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

you are disparaging him for disagreeing with you.

False.

I criticized the low effort OP, yet the discussion has improved within these comments. "I agree with almost everything you said here Jason, I am glad we are finding common ground." But I'd be happy to disparage you if you like.

I've never seen anyone defend your conduct.

Bitch please, here's a few...

when there is no power structure, someone will attempt to create an authoritarian one by force. And unfortunately, this time it's you.

Have another look. We're voluntaryists organizing ourselves. You are a perpetually argumentative whiner without a cause in search of shit to disturb and now to disrupt SaidIt, because you were disrupting SaidIt. Illogitroll. A taking-out-the-trash ban for <12 hours is hardly "authoritarianism". All it does is illustrate usehername-pussyification. Just request it if you'd like me to perpetual be a dick to you and I may do my best to comply - but even that won't be actual "authoritarianism" on this fringe forum. You don't even understand basic politics so how could you even understand what that big words means.