you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Note: "most of those posts and comments..." (Q-anon aren't the only extreme group.)

Name the moderates

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

moderates never get banned off reddit so stay there

i don't really have an explanation for why more true liberals don't come hrre, maybe cuz they see tons of rwers

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I think it would help if there were more moderates - that interesting discussions would develop. I only know of one, and perhaps another, moderate. The problem I and previous moderates have faced is constant harassment for anything we state or post.

[–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

You are not moderate, and are as fake as AOC.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Why, so you can belittle them?

Or so you can call them alt-right?

You don't care about understanding this userbase. You wouldn't have a shit post sub if that were the case.

The fact that you mentioned Q anon at all proves you are disingenuous. I can only think of one user who believes that nonsense.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Why do you make things up in all of your responses to me? It's impossible to discuss anything with you because you'll focus on imaginary issues you've made up and that don't relate to the discussion. You're an unusual user. Others don't constantly make up lies with all of their comments? Some of them do, but not as consistently as you do. The lie in this case is that you mentioned Q-anon in your previous post, in response to my first post, which did not mention Q-anon, and now you criticize my mention of Q-anon, as if it were my idea in my first post (but was not mentioned there). Instead, my mention of Q-anon was in response to your comment on the term. You do this sort of thing constantly, which re-directs discussion, which is NOT really about Q-anon. My 1st comment is about political bias. That's it. You also note that I don't "care about understanding this userbase", which is another lie, as many will tell you. I am here in order to try and understand these right-wing posts, some of which are extreme. I say this quite often. This is also why there is /s/ShitpostNews, which is a list I keep of the latest propaganda developments. Anyone can post there and make comments. If I were not trying to understand the userbase, I wouldn't have that list/sub. Please stop bothering me with these misdirections. There are other comments on Saidit you can read. Also - stop dragging discussions down the POD, as you do with EVERY response to me. Saidit is (supposedly) for civil discussion. When I noted this last time, you noted that I don't represent Saidit. This is another misdirection. One does not have to represent Saidit in order to follow the rules about the POD. I refer to the POD and M7's introductory invitation to Saidit. It's really simple and should be referred to more often.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If I claim that you are a liar and drag down the POD, will it make me a good moral citizen too?

You can always block people you don't like.