you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (21 children)

It's great to see this.

/u/magnora7 - I've read that:

SaidIt has a self-declared nonpartisan bias and lean for uncensored anti-corruption news and content. here

But I and others see only right-wing and so-called 'alt right' posts and comments (excluding mine) on Saidit, and most of those posts and comments are supporting the extreme right-wing disinformation propaganda of the corrupt .01% .

Genuine question: what are your thoughts on this aspect of Saidit?

[–][deleted] 9 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 3 fun -  (8 children)

Most people here reject Q-anon, AND there are plenty of moderates here, you just ignore them.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Note: "most of those posts and comments..." (Q-anon aren't the only extreme group.)

Name the moderates

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

moderates never get banned off reddit so stay there

i don't really have an explanation for why more true liberals don't come hrre, maybe cuz they see tons of rwers

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I think it would help if there were more moderates - that interesting discussions would develop. I only know of one, and perhaps another, moderate. The problem I and previous moderates have faced is constant harassment for anything we state or post.

[–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

You are not moderate, and are as fake as AOC.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Why, so you can belittle them?

Or so you can call them alt-right?

You don't care about understanding this userbase. You wouldn't have a shit post sub if that were the case.

The fact that you mentioned Q anon at all proves you are disingenuous. I can only think of one user who believes that nonsense.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Why do you make things up in all of your responses to me? It's impossible to discuss anything with you because you'll focus on imaginary issues you've made up and that don't relate to the discussion. You're an unusual user. Others don't constantly make up lies with all of their comments? Some of them do, but not as consistently as you do. The lie in this case is that you mentioned Q-anon in your previous post, in response to my first post, which did not mention Q-anon, and now you criticize my mention of Q-anon, as if it were my idea in my first post (but was not mentioned there). Instead, my mention of Q-anon was in response to your comment on the term. You do this sort of thing constantly, which re-directs discussion, which is NOT really about Q-anon. My 1st comment is about political bias. That's it. You also note that I don't "care about understanding this userbase", which is another lie, as many will tell you. I am here in order to try and understand these right-wing posts, some of which are extreme. I say this quite often. This is also why there is /s/ShitpostNews, which is a list I keep of the latest propaganda developments. Anyone can post there and make comments. If I were not trying to understand the userbase, I wouldn't have that list/sub. Please stop bothering me with these misdirections. There are other comments on Saidit you can read. Also - stop dragging discussions down the POD, as you do with EVERY response to me. Saidit is (supposedly) for civil discussion. When I noted this last time, you noted that I don't represent Saidit. This is another misdirection. One does not have to represent Saidit in order to follow the rules about the POD. I refer to the POD and M7's introductory invitation to Saidit. It's really simple and should be referred to more often.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If I claim that you are a liar and drag down the POD, will it make me a good moral citizen too?

You can always block people you don't like.

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (11 children)

SaidIt has a self-declared nonpartisan bias and lean for uncensored anti-corruption news and content.

Give me a fucking break.

I wrote that in 2019, literally on April 1st, though not as a joke.

When I wrote it, that page was long dead in 2017, and after me in 2019 someone moved the page, remaining dead since.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Open/planning&action=history

Your inauthenticity, bullshit, and ability to dredge up conflict knows no bounds.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

Nothing wrong with asking about the statement. Is it, or any part of it, true or not true?

SaidIt has a self-declared nonpartisan bias and lean for uncensored anti-corruption news and content.

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (9 children)

Is it, or any part of it, true or not true?

Are you, or any part of you, authentic or just a lying sock of shit?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

You call yourself a "truth seeker". Tell the truth. Is your sentence factual? Is it not? Was it a joke, and thus not factual? Moreover, where is Saidit's self-declaration that it's non-partisan and anti-corruption? (And stop insulting people who want to know the truth.)

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (7 children)

(And stop insulting people who want to know the truth.)

If you're not a lying sock of shit you have no insults to worry about.

If you can't see how you're lying, shilling, and supporting authoritarian bullshit, then you're not trying hard enough, as only you can stop most of the animosity that comes your way. If you're authentic it will be transparent and clear, but you're too deep in your own dense bullshit that you wear like a suit in a forum that doesn't like it. Why? Because you're here to disrupt.

Stop. Your. Bullshit.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Again, you've not answered the question (as has happened regularly), and instead want to post insults. It's really sad, Jason. That's an easy question to answer, and you don't have to answer it. (Repeatedly posting insults instead of information is merely a cowardly bullying tactic, often by those who want to spread lies without being questioned. You will see this in all of the extremist propaganda, paid for by the .01%. You be you, Jason, not those people.)

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

Instead of asking a question to my question, answer it or try asking a proper question - or just fuck off with your abundance of BULLSHIT LIES.

People know the difference between authenticity and your sealioning and shilling for the authorities. Your smears don't work and neither do your big pharma lies.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Instead of asking a question to my question

Look at the thread. You are lying. You responded to my question, which is:

Is it, or any part of it, true or not true?

With insults instead of an answer, and with this paranoid schizophrenic question:

Are you, or any part of you, authentic or just a lying sock of shit?

[–][deleted]  (3 children)

[removed]