Who wants to moderate /s/conspiracy?

submitted by [deleted] from self.SaidIt

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]JasonCarswell 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (10 children)

the Greater Israel narratives, which I've already completely destroyed

1) The Greater Israel thing IS A REAL PROBLEM.

2) You couldn't possibly have destroyed it.

3) Disagreement is not a reason to censor.

Jesus is a lot of crazy things but CIA crazy is not one of them.

WATCH THE MOD LOGS. If it comes up again then bring it up with the others. You all have to keep each other in line. Agree to disagree - without censoring. He's not perfect, you're not perfect, I'm not perfect. Only /u/d3rr is d3rrfect.

[–]HibikiBlack 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (9 children)

I agree nobody and I am not perfect. But I have to defend the idea that knowledge can be possessed. If I don't defend my own interpretations, then everything gets reduced to mob rule, very low on the pyramid of debate.

[–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (7 children)

But I have to defend the idea that knowledge can be possessed.

I don't know what that means.

[–]HibikiBlack 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

If I have a certain idea that I gained by observation, research or whatever, and if it is possible for us to have knowledge, I have all the right to defend my own theory. I'm not saying that this is what will always happen, but sometimes the only way to hold on to your own idea is to defend it from others. If you don't you will get crushed by the mob.

I have argued with these fellows over here a million times. They aren't interested in listening to my counter-arguments, they only want to crush my ideas. In the case of the Israel thing, I have all the right to claim that following the narrative is nonsense, and that this claim is a knowledge that I possess. It's fine if you don't agree with me or whatever, but don't come over to my sub to push that disinfo then.

[–]Jesus 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

/u/JasonCarswell

"I have the right to defend my own theory by banning and censoring those I disagree with because then I'll get crushed by the mob." - Hibikiblack

"If they do not agree with my interpretations and theories and post counter-arguments, they are not interested in my counter-arguments [which I rarely ever post], so it is my right to ban those who believe in the 'Greater Israel Project' conspiracy, which I have bigly destroyed by my huge knowledge that I possess. - Hibikiblack

Post in question:

I said nothing in the post about the 'Greater Israel Project' you said you banned me for.

Your ad hominem response:

Joachimite Catholic lunatic/stereotypical CIA misanthrope.

What you wrote:

Althought I have my reasons to be skeptical about it, this scenario is very similar to Albert Pike's letter about the outcome of WWIII Since the Jews would not only probably end up losing Israel but get a bunch of their own killed, then how could greater Israel ever be the final plan of the NWO?

My response:

^ ^ ^ That WWIII letter was a fake.

Indeed, it is a fake. Pike never wrote it and scholars have deemed it a compete forgery. Plus, why trust the lies of a racist Freemason anyway?

Your response:

You are the guy who hates tribalism and nationalism and make the claim that this world is a corruption and that radical supernaturalism is the answer to our problems, which are pretty much Jesuit ideals and you expect me to believe the claims you make of a Jewish World Domination plan, despite the fact that I have completely destroyed the Greater Israel narrative already?

Is this what I'm supposed to do /u/magnora7? Listen to the advices of the Catholic, supernaturalist dude that follows Jesuit ideals? the guys who were responsible for pushing anti-Semitism like crazy everywhere? I refuse to do something that stupid, this is anti-intellectualism incarnate.

So long, Jesus. I've tried reasoning with you many times already and you clearly don't care if you keep pushing the retarted Greater Israel narratives and barely mention the Jesuit technocracy.

It's over. With this I've completely eliminated the Catholic influence in my sub. It's been completely exterminated.

So, that resposne got me banned.

Seems like you have an issue with me criticising Jews, Israel and Zionism. For that reason, why do you, like every other Zionist, use the anti-Semitism canard? Oh, I forgot, only Jesuits can be Zionists. /s

[–]HibikiBlack 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

I make anti-Zionist posts the whole time. Also, you are really all over the place here...

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

gaslighting.

[–]HibikiBlack 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I'm imagining you editing my words and accusing me of being a Zionist then?

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

That's my interpretation of what you said above. And, after the break, I didn't edit your words, those are your posts.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks for laying it all out. I knew there were limitations and issues, but now I see more clearly.

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

"I have to defend my own interpretations of history by censoring and banning those I disagree with." the great sage, /u/hibikiBlack