SaidIt team changes June 2021

submitted by [deleted] from self.SaidIt

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]superfox 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (7 children)

with all respect, i am not here to work as an engineer at saidit, but if i was this bullshit that is going on would come to a screeching halt in about two nanoflops.

i am not here to work as an unpaid engineer in your little github nonsense.

i made a suggestion, and you mocked me, and so i am finished making suggestions.

i have been writing software since way the fk before you even knew what a diaper is.

i was writing C code before your mama had hit puberty.

and you cant sit up in your chair and attempt to have an intelligent conversation and attempt to formulate some plans to resolve the current situation?

and you wanna joke that omg we have been destroying this site for three years?

crawl the fk off my dick, with all respect.

and if you wanna ban me, i will just make another account.

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (6 children)

I'm sorry I mocked you. I don't believe that being able to block a user in a particular thread would solve any of saidits core issues. I see the core issues as vote manipulation through multiple accounts and spam and the whole on /s/all vs not on /s/all dilemma.

[–]superfox 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

jason carswell just got banned because of an argument with another user.

he was an long standing and active user in this forum.

to me, banning him was a clear sign that management has their heads shoved up their asses.

the jason carswell problem could have been dealt with in a much more diplomatic manner.

i did not witness the argument that caused him to be banned, but anyways.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

Jason and socks both refused to block* each other, for months and months. But if admins could have forced them to block each other, maybe that would have been better. Maybe socks would have used your block-per-post idea, but Jason certainly wouldn't have.

[–]superfox 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

my written words tend to make me seem like i am trying to be an ass, but that is not the case at all.

i strongly suggest that you take my advice and create a system that allows an OP to boot disruptive users from their threads.

i think that you will find that moderation issues will take care of themselves.

best wishes.

[–]superfox 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

since you are an admin, only your opinion really matters here, so if you say so then it is so..

but let me just explain what is a problem with your scenario...

if i(superfox) start a thread and you(d3rr) make comments in it that are disruptive, i could block you... but that only prevents me(the OP) from seeing your posts, but you would be free to continue to disrupt my thread.

that isnt really a solution in my opinion, and so the problem continues.

i am betting that within a couple of months, at the most, and this site will be shut down.

[–]Airbus320 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

And we will blame you

[–]superfox 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

oh my, that is harsh.

i am watching as your plane's wings have been ripped off and your flight is spiraling towards the ground in a ball of flames.

i am standing on the ground, smoking a blunt and enjoying a nice glass of tequila.

oh my, its all my fault.