you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 11 insightful - 4 fun11 insightful - 3 fun12 insightful - 4 fun -  (11 children)

It's just the "private" part of "private message" that concerns me. But anyway thank you for dealing with the drama.

[–][deleted]  (10 children)

[deleted]

    [–][deleted] 9 insightful - 9 fun9 insightful - 8 fun10 insightful - 9 fun -  (9 children)

    I don't share PMs unless people tell me to, or there's a crime involved

    Can you elaborate on the crime involved? Hypothetically speaking, if Jason were a pdf file, where in that PM did he admit to committing a sexual “crime”? Wouldn’t he know their name, as well as have at least one photo of them (or tried to get one)?

    He never said he was attempting to become romantically involved with them or was attracted to them in a romantic way (all he said was their wisdom was remarkable and he felt close with them- through talking and shared views and ideals); he basically said they were smart beyond their years, and he found it surprising how he had taken such a liking to them. He mentioned they were naive and lacked wisdom when it came to romance (they were innocent), but still felt they were wise beyond their years in other aspects, which he alluded to being the reason why he liked them; they were wise beyond their years.

    It seemed Jason would have been friends with this person regardless of their age, as the “connection” and “wisdom” is what’s constantly brought up - their wisdom being the thing that initiated their dialogues, and formed that connection - nothing degenerate.

    He didn’t mention doing or trying to do anything sexual w/ them.. didn’t say he tried to get her to meet up irl.. didn’t say he showed her a photo of his cock.. he said he didn’t even know their name (which means he didn’t ask), and didn’t even know what they look like (again, he didn’t even ask for a photo, as a pdf file?)

    So what did he do that was a crime, like if we were in real, legal court, what crime did he break in that PM? Also, if you’re banning him due to the socks situation, why even leak these PM’s and accuse him of something without allowing him to defend his name? Shouldn’t your reasoning for banning him due to the “socks thing” be enough? This seems.. extra?

    All he said was he found it remarkable, despite the brief time they communicated, how well they connected despite the age gap (as friends), how they were innocent yet wise beyond their years, and they were becoming what felt like a true friend on the internet (which he even mentions is odd - an older anarchist friends with a wise young girl), to the point he wondered if someone was trolling him or trying to honey pot him.

    And I don’t defend pdfilia whatsoever.

    If this is a crime, then I’m guilty in my 20’s (rn) and so are my irl friends for being like Jason, and for playing apex legends with this squeaker we met in a random match when only one other friend was available to play, who we introduced to the rest of our friend group, who’s based as fuck and super chill. We play with the kid at least once a week, don’t know his age but he says more crazy shit than we ever do lol.

    [–][deleted]  (8 children)

    [deleted]

      [–][deleted] 12 insightful - 9 fun12 insightful - 8 fun13 insightful - 9 fun -  (0 children)

      Wow, way to show your true colors and avoid my question all together.

      You were always so polite and kind to me. I didn’t insult you, I just asked you to please elaborate. I stated I don’t defend pedophilia. But if those PM’s are all you have, you don’t have much to make those accusations which is why I asked you to please elaborate, explain more and explain how those PM’s where indicative of a crime?

      You didn’t address my question at all.. and wow this is the first time I ever saw this side of you.. we’ve always had polite and cordial interactions.. you just blew my mind, TAM.

      Edit: & oh @ the irony of “protecting” the PoD when you just broke it as an admin and straw-manned me instead of giving me a valid reply...

      [–][deleted] 6 insightful - 7 fun6 insightful - 6 fun7 insightful - 7 fun -  (4 children)

      You’re right /u/d3rr. I’m out.

      Peace everyone.

      [–]LarrySwinger2 5 insightful - 8 fun5 insightful - 7 fun6 insightful - 8 fun -  (2 children)

      Hey Enza wanna join our private chat with Jason and a few others? I'm very close to launching an alternative forum and you're one of the people I wanted to invite. I don't want to lose you out of sight.

      Edit: this goes for people generally. The group chat is reserved for trusted folks (feel free to try regardless). The forum is already online, and anyone's free to PM me for an invitation.

      [–][deleted] 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

      I’m speaking with both Jason and d3rr right now, but sure I’d appreciate that greatly!

      Thank you!

      Edit: lol this whole post got AstroTurfed with up votes as soon as I asked TAM to elaborate and she attacked me. She rearranged the comments as this was in the top comment thread. TAM is astroturfing her own shit. Unbelievable.

      [–][deleted] 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

      Yep, his arrival sounded the doom of saidit.

      [–][deleted] 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

      Of course he is. If there is a no-nonsense user around here, it's u/d3rr. That's probably why he gave up being an admin.

      [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

      Proof? Show proof, or even at least EVIDENCE, please.