Shill/bot upvoting?

submitted by Intuit from self.SaidIt

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

I (and I think, M7) would agree with the last sentence, and I appreciate the detailed answer, but as you can probably guess, I am referring specifically to alt-right individuals who support the '88 Precepts' and are trying to influence various websites in order to push their agendas. It's not "hurr durr" guesswork. Anyone on Saidit has already seen plenty of it, but here are some lists of the resources used by these alt-right groups to spread disinformation and propaganda:

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=alt-right+social+media+gab+parler+8chan&t=h_&ia=web

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fake_news_websites

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fake_news_websites_in_the_United_States

[–]JasonCarswell 9 insightful - 5 fun9 insightful - 4 fun10 insightful - 5 fun -  (5 children)

Corrupt leftist Wikipedia on fake news must be cited with a grain of source.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

I know, right? Several disinformation sites aren't there, including Breitbart, newsbusters, racewar.news, zerohedge, WSJ, bitchute, jpost, thegloriousamerican, OANN, brighteon, trunews, newspunch, newswars, notthebee, dailymail.co.uk, reclaimthenet.org, legalinsurrection, bigleaguepolitics, pjmedia, theintercept, satanslibrary.org, countere, planet-today, fff.org, and various others. Lazy liberals (or whoever they are) can't bother to update the Wikipedia page; meanwhile Radical Republicans have been busy building disinformation sites like these and social networking sites, especially these past 4 years. Liberals better step up.

[–]ballooon 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

Daily Mail is not disinformation, it is the glorious british shitrag.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/daily-mail/

It's definitely a propaganda/disinformation website, though it tries not to look like one. There are many reasons for this, which would require a bit of an explanation.

[–]ballooon 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

That was sarcasm, of course the daily mail posts disinfo among its other embarassing stuff... I mean, who doesn't love populist crap with a sprinkle of celebrity tits here and there?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I see. (One can't be too sure on Saidit.) Glorious British Shitrag indeed.