you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ImHereForFinance 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I would prefer certain words commonly used in calls to violence to be banned. And that the post just has to be edited before posting. I dont want this to become voat.co. Banning is a pretty heavy measure and is counter productive. Reddit tier suggestion designed to manipulate the forum. Ideally the whole site would not have rules and rather different subverses could set up their own. EG. I would like to ban Q stuff because it is retarded. It would be nice if I could first set myself what I see and if the subs i visit could set banned words and ect. Banning a person should not happen. It should not be possible to put something bannable

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Not possible. A call to violence may use the same words as a description of a violent event. Human judgement is required, so perhaps flagging might be better. But even that I'm not convinced of as you've offered no list of words to even assess, nor can I even imagine a viable list much less a single word.

Yes, most Q stuff is retarded, but that's not a reason to ban it. Whoever posts it obviously needs the community to teach them how/why it's retarded.