I propose someone create /s/SubsWeWant. It would behoove us to discuss potential subs first, explain our goals, determine if better names exist, consider (co-)moderators, be encouraged or talked out of them, and help promote awareness about them. I have lists of sub ideas I think folks might like.

submitted by JasonCarswell from fairfield-highland.k12.oh.us

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Questionable 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

I admit I was a shitty admin,

I admit, I have no idea what you are talking about. Everything you have said here is wrong, as you are incapable of providing a proper self evaluation of your own tenure.

My appraisal is as follows:

Sufficient. With a tendency to be too harsh on ones self, and too accepting of criticism. Too open.

Advice:

Give less fucks. Question the validity of criticism. Evaluate criticism from a more objective perspective. Oh, and as a user, self limit submissions to only 2 categories to prevent over saturation of topics.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Okay, I was being negative and too hyperbolic in my self-criticism. I'm afraid what you'll think of my optimistic and self-aggrandizing counter-internal-monologue.

Your advice is sage. IMO, the big fucks should be given for big actions, the rest is dramatic word salad.

Limiting to 2 categories may be a good idea, though I'm not at all sure what you mean by it - and are there exceptions when it's breaking news?